the INSIDE story
$19 per YEAR
gets
you to the rest of the news, Archives, Research tools and straight talk you simply can't
get anywhere else, Click the newsdog NOW!
Power
To The Max
The internet is power
to
the people - our users. One of the many strengths of
The Dog Press is an involved
readership so flex your muscles and let us hear from
you! Send
Us Your News & Views
If published you win a
$50.00
certificate good on any NetPlaces
site and
qualify for
$100.00 CASH
and
The Dog Press Journalists
Award
TheDogPlace is
the OLDEST and the LARGEST dog site in the world.
Check it out now
Across The Board
Direct From The Major Registries
The American Kennel Club
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
November 2006 -
The American Kennel Club’s structure as a “club of clubs” is unique
among not-for-profit organizations. In addition to the AKC’s main
charge to govern the sport of purebred dogs and uphold the integrity
of the registry, we also provide valuable guidance to clubs in such
areas as hosting events, enlisting new members and helping clubs set
up their governance structure.
When it comes to a club’s administrative activities, one of the most
critical posts in any club is that of treasurer. Without sound
financial stewardship, clubs are not able to properly advance their
missions by holding dog events or conducting public outreach. Nor
can they donate money to the community in such diverse ways as
scholarships or donating K-9’s in areas where they are sorely
needed, etc.
The typical “job description” of a treasurer includes tasks such as
collecting and recording all monies due to or belonging to the club,
depositing monies in accounts on a timely bases, using monies to pay
the club’s debts, reporting on the status of monies at meetings and
compiling an annual report. These activities are very crucial to the
club’s fiscal health and should only be conducted by those with
experience in this area and not be left to chance.
Unfortunately, when things go awry with a club’s financial situation
it is very difficult to rectify. The AKC does not exercise
jurisdiction in these matters because it is impossible for us to
properly investigate cases that would require the legal authority to
subpoena bank statements and other private records. It is crucial
that clubs take preventative measures. I have listed below, what we
believe to be the best blueprint for success when dealing with club
monies and what has been recommended by major auditing companies:
°
Ensure that the club’s treasurer is bonded against loss of funds
(visit www.bond007.net for more information on a treasurer bond).
°
Perform a periodic audit of the treasurer’s records to:
°
Ensure proper invoices (or other documentation) adequately support
any payments.
°
Verify that bank reconciliations are performed accurately and
timely.
°
If possible, it is preferable to have a person approving invoices
different than the individual preparing and/or signing the checks.
Similarly, it is desirable to have an individual reconciling the
bank accounts who is different from the person preparing and /or
signing the checks. Segregation of these tasks provides a more
desirable level of internal control.
°
Consider establishing an audit committee of club members not
involved in preparing or signing checks. Their role would be to
annually review the details of all cash receipts and disbursements.
°
The Treasurer should prepare a quarterly balance sheet and an income
statement. This should include an itemized listing of all cash
receipts and disbursements during the quarter.
In the area of cash management:
°
All cash receipts should be deposited timely.
°
Bank accounts should be formally reconciled each month on a timely
basis.
°
Follow up on any checks outstanding for more than 3 to 6 months.
°
Consider requiring a second authorized signer for all checks over a
prescribed dollar amount, usually $250.
°
Consider investing excess funds in an interest bearing account or
certificate of deposit.
In an ideal world, we wouldn’t have to worry about these matters.
Yet from a practical standpoint, it is essential that we not bury
our heads in the sand and all make it our business to put sufficient
internal controls in place within each of our clubs. By reviewing
and embracing as many of these points as possible, clubs will go a
long way towards ensuring the financial stability and integrity of
their treasuries and enable members to continue the important work
they do for the benefit of purebred dogs. Sincerely,
Ron Menaker
Chairman
Highlights from the November 2006
meeting of the AKC Board
of Directors
°
The AKC
Inspections Program has been enhanced and the following procedure
adopted:
The AKC Kennel Inspections Program will achieve broader coverage and
prevent breeders from falling through the cracks by adopting a
risk-based system. This system would ensure that anyone whose
breeding reached threshold numbers would be inspected even if their
numbers dropped below the minimums in some years; it would require
annual inspections of all breeders of 25+ litters and all
distributors annually; 18 months inspections of 7+ breeders; and the
policy would include a number of random inspections.
°
Effective January
1, 2007, the individual dog registration fee is being increased to
$20. This action offsets inflation, standard operating cost
increases and takes into consideration recent registration
enhancements, including online services and other added-value
features. AKC registration fees have historically been raised every
few years to account for these factors, with the last increase
occurring in 2001. There is no change in the litter registration
fee. For more information visit: http://www.akc.org/contact/
answer_center/faq_dogreg_fee_increase.cfm
°
The Board approved
a non-regular International Class in Obedience, effective January 1,
2008. The intent is to enable American Dogs to better prepare for
international competition.
°
Obedience jump
heights are to be lowered to 3/4 the height at the withers for
Sussex Spaniels and for Kuvaszok, effective January 1, 2007.
°
A number of
amendments were made to the Spaniel Hunting Test Regulations,
effective February 1, 2007. The details are included in the minutes
of the November meeting.
°
Effective January
1, 2007, Kerry Blue Terriers, Pyrenean Shepherds, Norwegian Buhunds,
and Swedish Vallhunds, will be eligible to participate fully in AKC
Herding Events.
The following Delegates were approved:
°
Wayne Harmon,
Minneapolis, MN, to represent Cambridge Minnesota Kennel Club
°
Sharon Jolly, El
Paso, TX, to represent Rio Grande Obedience Dog Club
°
Judy R. Melear,
Fisherville, KY, to represent Louisville Kennel Club
°
Barbara L. Norton,
San Jose, CA, to represent Santa Clara Dog Training Club
°
Scott Olund, San
Raphael, CA, to represent Poodle Club of America
°
Marile A.
Waterstraat, Macedon, NY, to represent Nova Scotia Duck Tolling
Retriever Club (USA)
AKC JUDGING CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY
Here is the
actual policy that has generated so much debate:
"The American Kennel Club ® Board of Directors has adopted a new
Judging Conflict of Interest Policy, effective January 1, 2007. AKC
® believes that it has the best judges in the world and expends
millions of dollars a year to administer its judging approval system
to ensure that quality remains high.
“AKC judging approval confers a certain status on an individual and
with such status comes an enormous responsibility to both AKC and
the Sport as governed by AKC,” said President and CEO Dennis B.
Sprung.
The policy states, with some notable exceptions, that AKC approved
judges should be focused on judging and supporting AKC events.
Approved judges should not have a significant interest in another
registry that is in direct conflict with AKC or be judging for
another event-giving organization to the possible detriment of
events held by AKC member and licensed clubs.
The complete policy is as follows. Bolding has added
for added for emphasis.
JUDGING CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY
No AKC judge may have a significant interest in a dog registry or
dog event-giving organization deemed by the AKC Board to be in
competition with the American Kennel Club. Significant interest
would include, but not be limited to ownership of, employment by, a
directorship in, and holding office in.
Any AKC-approved judge, who shall judge a purebred dog event in the
U.S. not in accordance with the rules of AKC, which apply to such
purebred dog events without the express permission of the AKC, may
be disciplined even to the extent of having his or her AKC judging
approval revoked.
An AKC-approved judge may judge breeds that are notAKC registrable
and/or that they have not been approved for by AKC at non-AKC
events. The AKC Board has also given permission for the judging of
certain other events based upon the following criteria:
1. AKC has no comparable events in place.
2. While AKC has a program in place, AKC judges have officiated at
events under the aegis of the other organization for yearsbefore
the AKC program was initiated.
3. The type of event is not or would not be perceived as being
contrary to the best interest of AKC and the sport of purebred dogs.
4. The event is a breed or type of breed-specific performance
activity.
No
AKC approval is needed to judge versatility or performance
activities developed by AKC Parent Clubs and sponsored by such
clubs.
Events held by the following organizations meet the above criteria,
and AKC-approved judges may continue to judge them:
• American Sighthound Field Association Coursing Events
• American Working Terrier Association Earthdog Events
• American Herding Breed Association Events
• North American Versatility Dog Association Pointing Breed Hunting
Tests
• American Field Pointing Breed Field Trials
• United Kennel Club Coonhound Events
• Professional Kennel Club Coonhound Events
• Any of the various organizations sponsoring Agility Trials
Other activities may be added to this list at the discretion of the
AKC Board.