|
|
Across The Board
Direct From The Major Registries
 |
The American Kennel Club
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
|
June
2007 -
Last month in my Chairman's Report I reported on a pending threat to
purebred dog ownership in California: Assembly Bill 1634 would
require the mandatory spay or neuter of dogs 4 months or older
unless an intact dog permit is purchased through local authorities.
Should this bill become law, I fear it could be a catalyst for other
states. As the old saying goes, "As California goes, so goes the
nation."
As many of you know AB1634 passed by one vote on Wednesday in the
full Assembly. Despite this recent set back, it's important to note
that this vote was not strictly along party lines. Through our
continuing efforts, we were able to convince 6 Democrats to abandon
their majority party to vote against this bill in this Democratic
controlled body, just as we were able to convince other democrats to
vote against it in the May 16th hearing when the Assembly Committee
on Appropriations voted 10-to-6 in favor of the bill.
I want to sincerely thank the more than 600 dedicated fanciers who
attended the Appropriations Committee hearing, all the California
AKC-Affiliated Clubs and their hard-working members who have
diligently been advocating against this proposed law, and all people
across the country who sent letters, faxes and e-mails to California
legislators.
The next step for the bill is in the State Senate where it will go
through several committees and possible revisions before a vote.
Should this bill pass in the Senate it would then go back to the
Assembly for another vote, before it heads to the Governor. As you
can see, this is going to be a long process. It took 3½ months just
to pass in the Assembly. And while we have a long fight ahead of us,
we are encouraged by those whose vote we have swayed to the side of
reason.
It is vital now that California dog owners and breeders contact
their State Senators as well as the Governor to express their
opposition to this bill as it continues its journey through the
California statehouse. Contact information for all California State
Senators, along with sample letters and talking points to oppose
this bill are available on the AKC web site at the
CA Spay/Neuter Action Center
While the sponsor of AB 1634 has amended the bill five times since
its introduction, none of the amendments make this bill an
acceptable piece of legislation. AKC vehemently opposes AB 1634 and
will continue our strong opposition until this bill is defeated.
As you recall, I also announced last month that AKC was pursuing the
possibility of starting a Political Action Committee (PAC). I am
pleased to report that this endeavor is underway. In today's
political climate, having access to lawmakers is critical.
Establishing a PAC will allow dog lovers, responsible owners and
dedicated breeders to support what they believe in as well as give
AKC another tool for battling the continuing threat of anti-dog laws
in California and across the country.
In the meantime, we have received inquires from individuals and dogs
clubs as to how the purebred dog community can support AKC's efforts
to combat ongoing negative canine legislation. Individuals or dog
clubs can send a non-tax deductible contribution to our Canine
Legislation Department. For details visit our website at: http://www.akc.org/canine_legislation/donations.cfm.
The AKC/Eukanuba National Championship is scheduled to be held in
Long Beach in December 2007 & 2008. Although we have considered
making Long Beach the permanent home, I have communicated to both
the Mayor of Long Beach and to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger that
enactment of AB 1634 would make that impossible.
While AKC is a national organization leading the way in opposing
proposed anti-dog laws, it is important for fanciers to also
establish regional organizations, both statewide and locally, to
oppose flawed legislation. This must be done on a continuing basis
and not just when negative canine legislation is introduced. An
established and adequately funded organization that is active
year-round can make the biggest impact with lawmakers by
communicating with them prior to damaging legislation being
introduced. All clubs must now include active involvement in our
legislative challenges on their agendas.
One of the pillars of our opposition to AB 1634 is that we believe
the best weapon in combating irresponsible pet ownership is
education. We put those words into action every day of the year
through dog shows, community events, seminars, brochures and much
more. Each September we have a special opportunity to demonstrate
our incredible strength in numbers and to increase our ability to
address issues in our local communities by participating in AKC
Responsible Dog Ownership Day. Now in its fifth year, this
initiative has hundreds of AKC clubs and other like-minded
organizations holding free public events all over the nation. We
call on all California fanciers and clubs to show solidarity by
signing up to hold an event at: http://www.akc.org/clubs/rdod/index.cfm.
While the events will take place in September, we are currently
enrolling clubs and will be announcing how many are scheduled to be
held statewide in the coming weeks. We hope to be able to use the
number of California events as a tangible example of our commitment
to public education.
Demonstrating our commitment to public education is critical to
defeating AB 1634. I believe we can best accomplish this by having
all our "hands" on deck to demonstrate our opposition to the bill
and the positive effects of public education in our local
communities.
Sincerely,

|
No Board Minutes in June,
Delegates meeting
Mr. Menaker's comment "through our
continuing efforts, we were able to convince...." implies that AKC
was able to convince some to vote against the bill. It could
be just a slip of the lip except it is typical of the way in which
AKC phrases references to legislation.
Is it "we" as in the nurse's greeting
"how are we doing today?" when there's only one of you in the
hospital room, or is it meant in the collective sense of AKC and
the thousands of dog owners who actually attend legislative
meetings, carry posters, and work their buns off on the front lines?
Many in the fancy say it is the
people who are doing the work. AKC provides form letters
and advice (both of which are also available from independent
legislative groups), sends email notices, and writes to selected
legislators. AKC staff, board members, and former AKC
board member Jim Holt were paid to lobby the show fancy and
politicians in support of PAWS. It is people who have
no financial stake in the game, who are not paid for time
spent and travel to and from meetings and protests. It is the
average dog or cat owner (Cat Fanciers Assoc. has been very
proactive) who fights vigorously for their right to own intact
animals of the breed they love.
Mr. Menaker gives generous credit to CA
clubs and all fanciers in the next paragraph before reverting to the
"we" and "us" without use of clarifying adjectives such as "we
all" or "all of us" or "all clubs". To some, it is
nitpicking to point that out. To others, its a slap in the
face. No offense but perhaps we should all be a bit more clear
about who "we" are.
Paragraph 5 promises "contact
information for all Calif. Senators". Contact information is
7th in a list of "Action Items" on the link provided. 1st on
the link is a plea for donations, not to the clubs that so
desperately need financial help but to the AKC Canine
Legislation Department!! A not-for-profit corporation that
takes in 50 to 70 million dollars per year is asking for your
donations! Go figure.
The report then moves on to the
formation of a PAC which many believe is as good as a done deal.
Then there's another pitch for donations to AKC. Then the next
paragraph appears to suggest sending money to AKC might be a
solution if you don't have an established, adequately funded,
year-round group or club
Mr. Menaker is right in that education
is a strong weapon in opposing anti-animal legislation. In the
broader sense, and in the opinion of most professionals, the
strongest weapon in achieving any agenda (i.e. "educating" the
masses), is a strong marketing and public relations plan.
Participating in AKC's Responsible Dog Ownership day would go a long
way towards educating people if it were televised and if the news
services picked it up. I'm sure the board has thought of that.
You may not agree with our staff's
perception of AKC's position, the legislative challenges we face, or
what can be done to improve survival chances for "show breeders" of
the future. Fair enough. We want to hear and share your
opinions, corrections, objections, and suggestions.
Send to
Show Breeder Survival
Across
The Board Index
Send Club News to
contact@thedogpress.com |