Public Image 
Are we our own worst enemy?  "Instead of kennel owners fighting laws and complaining to each other...."

Registering Commercial Breeders
Why not buy from a pet shop?  "people don't care about royal bloodlines or pedigrees going back centuries.  They want a puppy for the kids."

Prescription Inserts
Got action! In less than a week Pfizer's scanners had picked it up from TDP.  

Responsibility For Dangerous Dogs 
"never heard one single dog person ... accept the fact that some dogs might be more inclined to bite than others,"

Responsibility For Dangerous Dogs Take Two
"..unless and until you change that perception these breeds will continue to get legislated."

Responsibility For Dangerous Dogs (Again)

Facts About Pit Bulls 
by Cindy Cooke, V.P. 
Dog Events
UNITED KENNEL CLUB

Other Columns

Letters To Editor
Impacting thousands of people. 

Reinwald Report
someone "doing something" about puppy mills.

A Funny Thing Happened..  Got a funny story to tell?

Prescription Inserts

02/01/00 - Project 2000 With all the controversy surrounding the use of the drug Revolution (and others) I'd like to take an opportunity to propose a solution. One that benefits everyone, but ultimately our pets most of all.

I started out by doing a little research on the drug.  The drug manufacturer states under Adverse Conditions: (<=0.5% of 1763 treated cats and dogs reported symptoms) very similar to those experienced by Sage. That means that if you treat 1,000 dogs, five might have adverse reactions. Now I know that no drug is 100% safe 100% of the time. Penicillin changed the world, yet some people will die if given penicillin for a scratch. Every night on TV I see ads for Rogaine, Propecia, Prozac, etc. and they always have the disclaimer - some people may exhibit certain side effects such as vomiting, nausea, etc., be sure to check with your doctor. So it seems to me to become a question of what is acceptable risk. Add to this the fact that you are using a substance that by it's very nature you know is a toxin to at least some organisms, and is seems that there has to be an understandable level of risk. 

The fault here, in my opinion, is one of education. The vet should have explained to the dog owner the possibility of side effects, and what to look for. With every prescription I get at Eckerd's, they always put in the bag a page of instructions, possible side effects, what medications should not be taken together, and what to do if I do have an adverse reaction. And certainly, the vet should have recognized the possibility of side effects, known how to treat them, and if nothing else taken steps to rule it out.

I don't think you can expect a drug company to make a drug that is 100% safe. Even if they handed out placebo's, a diabetic will react to the sugar pills. But they do have a responsibility to make it as safe as they can, and then to educate the veterinarians that will be dispensing the product. Then it becomes the vet's responsibility to inform the pet owner, and to be capable of recognizing and treating side effects.

Though pharmacies have been taking heat lately for incorrectly filling prescriptions, they do perform one added service. They are a check to busy doctors. They assume the doctor didn't take the time to fully inform the patient about the drug they just prescribed, and the reputable ones will at least give you a fact sheet on the drug. Maybe vets should do the same thing. Whatever the means, pet owners need to be better educated about the drugs their pets are receiving, and the vet is the front man for the drug companies. And if a vet doesn't know or understand a drug, they have no business prescribing it.

While pet pharmacies aren't the answer, prescription inserts might be. It's a solution to a growing problem that everyone benefits by. In the long run, it would be cheaper for the drug companies to provide fact sheets on their product than to settle numerous lawsuits, and they are providing a service to the end users of their products. If consumers are better educated about a prescription drug, that drug in turn becomes a safer product.

So when my pet is prescribed a medication just include a fact sheet just like my pharmacist gives me. In print that I can read, and terms that I can understand. Drug companies save on litigation, I'm happier, and my pet is safer and healthier.

When this post came in to DogTalk it became the First TDP Project.  In less than a week Pfizer's scanners had picked it up from TheDogPlace and the pharmaceutical giant issued a press release stating that they were going to start issuing product information with every prescription. The press release it used almost identical wording from this site and it even used the same 'local pharmacy' analogy as an example. We are glad to see them taking this first step but this will remain as TDP PROJECT 2000 until such time as it becomes common practice for all distributors of pet prescriptions.  Pfizer still does not do prescription inserts in all of its products and there is still much to be done to protect our dogs.

How do you feel about Prescription Safety for you and your pets?

Letters To The Editor  click here to comment