|
Keep Fleas Off!
Bathing a dog is one thing, a cat
is another. If you can use this method on a cat....Dogs? No
Problem!
Pesticide-Free Flea
Control for Cats,
Dogs, and Small Furry Friends!
The answer is
to "keep the fleas off"
Click
PP
Icon
for more,
including order information |





|

Be A Winner!
Reach over (currently)
8,455 HEADlines Subscribers
YOUR AD
HERE for
$125
(or
less)
per month
Call 888-515-DOGS
to secure your
top position now!
|

Dog People
Serving Dog People
Science and
Advisory Board
represents
over 700
years
of Professional experience
the Mission Statement
is
Who We Are
|
Copyright © 2008
TheDogPress.com - Reprint rights
hereby granted
provided
a link to this page is included in the
article and the URL or a copy of the article
is sent to Press Publications P.O. Box 3037,
Rutherfordton, NC 28139 or
contact@thedogpress.com upon
publication. Under penalty of law, no
portions thereof may be otherwise stored or
reprinted in any form, without prior express
written consent. |
|
We
Are Being Betrayed
by AKC
Analysis and
Alternatives by Julie Borst Reed
Seems the AKC is going to be assisting
Petland in training their employees to register the puppies as
part of the sale of the little guys. Apparently the new step is
that the registration fee for AKC is to be a part of the price
of the pup. It is an added step to assure more $ to AKC through
more registrations and Petland has the bonus of employee
training and the ever-closer affiliation with the big stamp of
the AKC seal of approval for their dogs discussed during the
(often times impulse) sale.
I wonder if employees of the stores will be wearing AKC badges
or pins? No doubt an AKC banner will be in the store windows
soon enough throughout the malls and the halls of Petlands
across the country. AKC "merchandise" sold here - that includes
the puppies. Can you just imagine thinking such a thing fifteen
years ago?
If AKC is so in need of revenue, why don't they just make it a
prerequisite of litter registration that the dogs all be
individually registered at that time or close to that time like
many of us already do and have done for decades? Today, we can
register individuals on line and not have to wait weeks for
paperwork to shuffle back / forth past receiving the litter
registration in the mail after applying for it on line. Possibly
they could skip mailing that expensive packet and let us do
everything on line if we choose? I believe that is to be a new
option. Those breeders that say they don't want to spend THAT
money are contributing to whatever the accountants at AKC let go
wrong. Well, it seems that something has gone terribly wrong and
that now they seem to need revenue so desperately. They put too
much dependency on the puppy mill money and those millers fled
to NEW registries when AKC tried, with a conscience, to enforce
the popular sire/dam DNA testing and more involved inspections.
<sigh> Just get out of the gutter AKC!
AKC is ever-so-increasingly becoming a large volume breeder's
registry again for their survival and not the registry for the
betterment of pure-bred dogs as those that formed the charter
intended. AKC is expanding it's role for the betterment of
pure-bred milled dogs - not a bad thing, but not what many
dedicated fanciers see as the true role of the AKC. In any case,
many people are expressing great concern over the association of
AKC in the Petland pet stores as an assistant employee trainer.
We know the badges and banners are just around the corner.
I have had the chance to mull over, to think about, the
ridiculous amount of stretching thin this dog pedigree REGISTRY
has done to itself and how people are to believe the defense and
reasoning of over-spending and over-reaching, mistakes in
judgment and paths taken and how they are to understand
additionally, that "that's the way we have always done it" and
how the dedicated fancy is to go on, in appreciation of
benefiting from morally wrong money raising tactics so they can
better enjoy their dog sports in the USA under that same AKC
banner. If that is not what has been written along with so many
other fallacies (like a judge with more than one registry
assignment is hurting the AKC! - the AKC states it can't even
afford to put one shows*), than I will need to read the
information again and again until I too am brain-washed into
believing the "stories" now from AKC.
Many kennel clubs across the world do not tolerate puppy mills
registering dogs with them, nor do they need or solicit their
monies. <Many also belong to the FCI, which for some reason the
AKC has set itself apart from.> Take the Canadian Kennel Club
(the real CKC) to our north. Yes, it is part of the Canadian
Dept of Agriculture (I am a member for the last couple of years,
due directly to the AKC's tightly closed stud book rules which
further makes no sense in their stance on promoting truly
healthy dogs).
The Canadian Kennel Club does not permit any of their CKC
registered dogs/puppies to be sold through retail outlets such
as pet stores. Bravo!*
All Canadian Kennel Club puppies must be permanently identified
(that has been a prerequisite there for decades) AND registered
by their breeders. More Praise!
Why has the AKC failed to accept these types of measures long
ago? Requiring breeders to register their dogs before
sale/placement would increase revenue . . . oh, but it would
chase even more puppy millers away - boo hoo.
There is no reason on this planet that the AKC has to continue
to groom and placate the puppy mills - oh yes, forgot, $$$$ and
poor decisions with that money is the one reason. Revenue should
be sought elsewhere and quickly. Listen to the elected delegates
from the AKC clubs. The AKC, brought down to a smaller version
of itself as well as more money spent by those actually
participating in the events (much higher entry fees have been
needed for a long time - again, Canadian shows for an example -
they nearly pay their own way. I understand there may not even
be supplementation from the Dept of Agriculture there for minor
things, but I am to understand explicitly, not for the dogs
shows). Have you ever read the CKC magazine? It is very well
done and is called "Dogs In Canada." It doesn't get smaller
every year like the Gazette, it gets better. Many of us wish for
the AKC to shed the millers and get back to being better without
them too.
Did you know that it is illegal to sell puppies from pet stores
in many European countries today? People of those countries have
no trouble finding pets. Why would it be difficult for US
citizens, if other countries' citizens obtain pets without
retail puppy mill outlets? What is the difference? Perhaps it
takes a bit more effort to obtain a puppy in those countries;
many would agree that is not bad to have to take one's time and
put in a bit of effort to obtain a companion animal. I was very
saddened but not shocked to learn about this recent partnership
with Petland and AKC, don't forget Hunte and AKC . . . all in
bed together and I think many exhibitors are tired of helping to
make that bed.
Then
one must ask, as this main kennel club of the USA says it can't
function without puppy mill money and the member clubs say don't
function with puppy mill money . . . what will the professional
handlers of the USA do when the AKC no longer holds shows? UKC
does not permit them and better not ever!
Write letters if
you care!
Julie Borst
Reed
jborst1@san.rr.com
*Actually, not competing in AKC
events may help the AKC in 2006, with the plummet from 1.5
million registrations of individual dogs in 1992 to 550,00 in
2005 per a recent post, it is costing the AKC to put on shows.
Maybe they need a year or two moratorium? When the AKC
treasurer, Miriam, stated at the now famous September 2006
Delegates meeting, that to disallow the puppy millers money
would send the AKC entry fees to $75.00 - finally - it was
stated, what I had been saying since learning about how much the
AKC depended upon the Puppy Mill revenue back about 1990!
Actually, I think he asked the group of angered delegates if
they wanted to pay $75.00 for entry fees. When the minutes come
out, we will know just how he worded it, but realize that is a
HUGE acknowledgement of the AKC dependency on miller monies and
how it affects the everyday exhibitor.
As most of you know, The American Kennel Club and Pet Land have
entered into a contract that will help Pet Land register any dog
that is eligible to be registered with
AKC.
On the surface this may appear fairly benign and AKC wants us to
think that it is just another way to register dogs. My position
is that no matter the reasoning by AKC, the general public will
perceive that this as an endorsement of purchasing a puppy from
a pet store. I predict AKC banners for the windows at Petland
and badges for the employees have already been designed and
ordered. The AKC is half way to getting rid of puppy mill money,
it should not dive back after it, but reformat to thrive without
the puppy mill registration dollars.
Many of us have worked very hard to ensure that our dogs are
health tested before
breeding to maintain the integrity of our breed. Volume
breeders and puppy mills do not do appropriate testing and
appear to be only interested in their bottom line. We have all
seen any number of puppy mills with dogs living in horrific
conditions and even if that is all perfectly cleaned up, these
puppies produced are often purchased on impulse from retail
outlets in shopping malls . Again, they are often products of
dogs that have not had even the basic health screenings for
inherited disease.
Handy links:
__________________________________

For More Articles by Julie;
Ethics, AKC Teaching Judges to Judge
We Are Being Betrayed By AKC
AKC Conflict Policy - Not In Our Best Interest |