Unaligned News For The Dog Show Fancy

 

 

Columns by

Top Dog Writers

 

Breed & Kennel

Club News

 

SideEffects on

the Dog Fancy

 

ShowShots and

Dog Show Events

 

Dog-e-Book

Yellow Pages

 

Advertising

Rates

 

The Dog Press

FREE SUBSCRIPTION


When the WWW took off in 1998 TheDogPlace, our affiliate, became the world's largest, and most comprehensive dog site.  It also set an internet standard for writer credentials & I.D.


Today it is even more important to know who you are reading so please,
Meet The

(Dog) Press

 

 

The world's largest dog-e "yellow pages" "Where Everyone Who's Anyone"
is easy to find

Get your free listing now!

 

AKC Stud Book

Pedigree Fraud part 1

Pedigree Fraud part 2

Pedigree Fraud part 3
Pedigree Fraud part 4

 

Power To The Max

The internet is power to the people. 
The strength of
The Dog Press

is involved readers so flex your muscles and let us hear from you! 
Send Us Your News & Views
If published you win a $50.00 certificate good on any NetPlaces site and qualify for $100.00 CASH and
The Dog Press Journalists
Award
TBA in November

 

PK4 INTERNET MARKETING STRATEGY


TDP's Science &
Advisory Board

represents over

two centuries
of Professional experience


Mission Statement

 


Subscribe TODAY for Insider Access to TheDogPress!

 

For those who want to know

the INSIDE story $19 per YEAR gets you to the rest of the news, Archives, Research tools and straight talk you simply can't get anywhere else, Click the NewsDog NOW!

 

TheDogPlace is
the OLDEST and the LARGEST dog site in the world.

 

Check it out now


December 28, 2005 Editorial - Read the Exemption!


Barbara "BJ" Andrews BioThe Exemption!

Sen. Rick Santorum, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Research, Nutrition and General Legislation, is blamed for the infamous PAWS bill which has raised the hackles of dog and cat people in record-setting numbers. Santorum gets the blame, AKC gets the credit. Bad guy, good guy? You decide.

 

AKC Chairman Ronald Menaker testified in support of the bill on November 8th. Was the whole PAWS “battle” just a charade to make a billion-dollar deal more palatable?  Make no mistake; Hunters won The Exemption.  Strongly supported by the National Rifle Association and other politically powerful lobbying groups, Hunters are well represented in local and state economy/tax/license structures.  Most notably, we were NOT backed by our organization.  Is it possible that the effective opposition from Hunters was the only unexpected glitch?  So "the exemption" was cleverly turned into a pacifier for a gullible dog and cat fancy?
 

If so, it worked.  We thrilled with The Exemption even though (predictably) 90% of us don’t understand it!  Oh "they" know us.  We’re told it was a victory by the very people who want PAWS passed. We've been spoon fed the idea that PAWS was inevitable. We’re told AKC fought for us every step of the way and that ultimately those efforts brought about The Exemption for us elite show breeders. 
 

But wait, the only significant change is in this statement from AKC. “The modifications include an additional exemption for breeders who sell dogs and cats only at retail and are in compliance with certified kennel inspection standards, such as those of the AKC.” 

 

That sentence is loaded! If you breed more than six litters OR (not “and”) sell more than 25 dogs you are not exempt. In addition to exempting hunters, there was also some re-wording to exempt a “non-profit organization that receives federal approval” or “a shelter or rescue organization that does not import for resale or operate for profit.”  Expect a rush of non-profit applications.  Know that shelters will continue to import saleable dogs while killing thousands of not-as-adoptable dogs. That is what they’ve been doing and that is what has been covered up and it continues to be protected in the so-called Exemption.
 

But here’s the kicker, direct from AKC. If you exceed the six litters/25 dogs, the exemption, if it ever becomes reality, would apply only if you are inspected by a non-profit organization that receives federal approval such as AKC.
 

For you, nothing has changed. I saw no mention of exemption for co-bred litters.  If your name is on the sale or breeding of more than six litters or 25 dogs, you must expose your sales records and your home to inspection!!! What has changed is that now, presumably as planned from the very beginning, it will be AKC that inspects you!  No doubt that service will surely be paid for with a never-ending flow of tax dollars, although I predict the AKC will also figure out a way to collect from the breeder.  Once passed, there’s no limit to how the new program can be changed or implemented.  The most common phrase (sadly) now associated with AKC is "it's all about the money."  I predicted last Sept. 2005 that PAWS fit that phrase.  So did a handful of other journalists who feared PAWS more than the wrath of AKC.
 

Our backs went up over AKC's embrace of the puppy mills (otherwise known as the HVBC) and even though in the end, show breeders rolled over, PAWS was not as easily swallowed.  Consequently, a little more care is now being taken in how things are marketed to an increasingly wary dog fancy. A recent AKC press statement is a great example “’These problems need to be addressed for the sake of dogs and the pet buying public,’ said Menaker. "However, it is also essential that we maintain the sport and hobby of purebred dog breeding and exhibiting as it is today, an activity regulated by our own rigorous compliance standards. The new exemption provision and other changes secured through AKC’s work with Sen. Santorum and other interest groups helps PAWS achieve that balance.”
 

The Exemption verbiage is deliberately confusing but legal scholars will happily interpret it, especially those in the employ of AKC and HSUS. In October 2005, we dared speculate that AKC would benefit from a never-ending flood of PAWS-generated money. The December AKC press release revealed that what had only been speculation had quickly and silently become a done deal!! Twelve words buried in glowing text state AKC’s kennel inspection programs and standards are certified by the Secretary of Agriculture.
 

Rolling right on past that earth shaking statement, AKC proudly points out “The kennel standards certified by the Secretary must be at least equivalent to those required by the United States Department of Agriculture under the Animal Welfare Act.” Amazing, very much like the way we were told about the HVBC and the Board’s position on PAWS’ after-the-fact and matter-of-fact, no big deal, characterize it however you wish. While digesting that rotten bit of news, wonder if that “standard” is the same one which proscribes calling the puppy mill to notify of an inspection appointment? Would those be the standards that ignore incredibly inhumane conditions despite “USDA inspection” as recorded and broadcast a few years ago a two-part special entitled  Doomed Dogs Of Missouri? Have things changed significantly? Well yes, if we believe the AKC officials who were the guests of the ever-growing, mega-miller Hunte Corporation…..
 

These are my opinions based on both solid AKC information and the knowledge that the new inspection deal represents a fountain of funds that never run dry. A highly respected associate pointed out that it would be better to be inspected by a dog person, i.e. AKC, than by a vet, particularly a USDA inspector who is “conditioned to conditions” that would make any decent dog owner shudder! She is usually right and no doubt, she is this time. The point is that it didn’t have to happen! This was about big business, political handshakes (I would not imply there was any kind of pay-off) gaining lost tax revenue from non-reported sales income, and control.
 

So go ahead, talk to yourself. Ask yourself (and answer) some questions before you register your next litter with the American Kennel Club, which notably, is the only registry participating or benefiting from PAWS!!!!! Others may cave, but only the American Kennel Club wants PAWS.
 

I have happily invested forty years in exhibiting our dogs. I would never knowingly misjudge AKC. I’ve told by a higher-up in AKC that I’m “known to be critical of AKC” and I plead guilty but - I only question and report what AKC does! If I’ve ever been wrong (on any observation regarding AKC) in more than twenty-five years of columns, it has not been brought to my attention by anyone, least of all the AKC.

 

I would never do anything to harm the sport or the association which has given us so much joy and so many friends. Questioning the method and motivation behind PAWS makes me less than popular at the moment but like any hot potato, it needs to be opened up.
 

When journalists report something and the situation is corrected or the bad guys are excised for the overall good of the people it’s like cutting away a cancer. It may be painful but it's healthy in the long run. Having been told I’m fighting a hopeless battle and been warned to “stay out of it” signals something inherently wrong with PAWS and the motivation behind it.
 

You should make up your own mind. To that end, I share this quote, “AKC is extremely pleased with recent developments regarding PAWS. As Mr. Menaker stated in his Chairman’s Report last month “The success of any legislation in Congress is uncertain, but we will continue to represent the needs and voice the concerns of our breeders in this legislative process. We are proud to continue to sit at the table as an equal, as we have since the introduction of this legislation, and strive to make a real difference that benefits our responsible breeders and the welfare of all dogs.”’

 

I direct you to the AKC website for more information.
http://www.akc.org/enewsletter/taking_command/2005/december/paws.cfm

Barbara J. Andrews

Handy links:______________________

 


If you haven't checked in at Project: PAWS Section for position statements, latest news and progress, go there now!  Also the Dog Federation Of Wisc. has been on top of this problem and the site is full of easy to digest information.  http://www.dfow.org/h14.htm

Send your letters or items of interest to Editor@TheDogPress.com
 

Copyright © 2002-2009 TheDogPress.com  - All rights reserved.  Under penalty of law, no portions thereof may be stored, reproduced or reprinted in any form without first obtaining written consent of the publisher Reprint Permission

 

Privacy Policy - Disclaimer