NATIONAL PARKS & WILDLIFE
MANAGEMENT
Here’s an “animal-friendly purpose” for which $billions of your
money is spent. Your ruff will go up when you learn how the government
“cares about” wildlife.
April 2011 |
Sam Harper |
TheDogPress
My daughter is tuned in to SAOVA. I saw
eye to eye with Bob Kane. His successor is a lot nicer but just as much
on top of political stuff. Susan Wolf reminds us that there are a lot of
new faces in state capitols. I wouldn’t get too enthusiastic about that
but she suggests “If you cannot meet
personally with a legislator, the best methods of communication are:
telephone calls, faxes and direct emails to key staff.”
Susan
says staff can have a lot of influence on department policy. This old military
man can vouch for that. If it weren’t for staff, my division would’ve stayed in
camp. Might be the same for AKC and judges, I wouldn’t know but some staffer
must have thought this release was an inside joke. I found it downright unfunny.
“April 1, 2011 marks the beginning of data collection for the
National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation.
It is conducted every five years by the Census Bureau (???)
sponsored by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service” paid for with your tax
dollars.
Robert Groves is director of the Census Bureau. Now I don’t know the
guy but I’ve got him pegged. Sounds like his publicist wrote this,
"Participation in this survey is important because the results help us
better manage our natural resources and to understand the demands being
put on our wildlife and their habitat." Then something I didn’t know.
"This is one of the many surveys conducted by the Census Bureau for
other federal agencies." What other surveys does the Census
Bureau take? I’ll check that out.
|
Believing the elk were threatened, park managers protected them
by killing all the predators. The elk herds multiplied so much
that they ate the trees the beavers used to make their dams and
houses.
|
Anyway, this one is supposed to be about “individuals involved in
fishing, hunting and other wildlife-associated recreation, such as
observation, photography and feeding.” That silver-tongued staffer says
we spent “$122 billion in pursuit of these activities” but fails to
mention how much the Census Bureau is spending on the project. So when
I tell you what I’m about to tell you, you might want to drop them a
line.
The
Census Bureau is going to find out which park gets the most
“activities.” Guess they can’t read the signs and tourist hand-outs
proclaiming the Great Smokey Mountains as “the most visited National
Park,” even more than Yellowstone.
This
line set my teeth on edge. “Federal and state agencies use this
knowledge for conservation efforts and to maintain areas where we go for
outdoor recreational activity.” Remember I thought it was a joke? The
release actually said, “Data collection will begin April 1, 2011” and
this Fool is supposed to believe “All information collected is kept
strictly confidential and only statistical totals are published.”
Read
this and then contact the U.S. Census Bureau office 301-763-3030/3762
(fax) e-mail:
pio@census.gov
Ask
why it is that in 1903 Yellowstone National Park was
teeming with wildlife. President Roosevelt (a keen hunter and
naturalist) ordered them to preserve the park in the condition he had
found it. Old Teddy meant well, never occurred to him that they would
ban the Indian hunters who had kept the ecological balance intact by
taking elk, moose, and bison as needed. The “untouched wilderness” that
President Roosevelt sought to preserve had been doing just fine for
thousands of years. Then the government stepped in.
The Park Service was formed to keep it “pristine” but they decimated
species after species. Believing the elk were threatened, park managers
protected them by killing all the predators. The elk herds multiplied so
much that they ate the trees the beavers used to make their dams and
houses. The beavers disappeared and “water management” problems
exploded. Meadows and small streams dried up causing trout and otter to
die or go elsewhere. Like beavers, they don’t drive, so you know what
happened. The resulting soil erosion the beavers had industriously
prevented caused widespread plant life damage.
By
the 1920s there were so many elk that park rangers were ordered to kill
them. So they shot them by the thousands but the changes in park
ecology couldn’t be undone. In an equally dumb move paid for by an
unending supply of tax dollars, the federal government decided to
protect the cattle ranchers who had grazing permits for what deer, elk,
and bison used to eat. But those grazers were so thinned down that
starving wolves took cattle, easy prey. So they were eradicated with
poison bait and just as gruesome, leg-hold traps. So then rabbits took
over the park, further decimating already fragile vegetation. So
“wildlife management” trapped and imported wolves to control the rabbits.
Understanding nothing of regeneration, the park service spent $$$
billions on fire prevention. Well hell, the government officials
finally realized their mistake and decided to burn off the overgrowth.
The old growth forest and dry stunted undergrowth burned like an
inferno! The intense heat sterilized the ground and they had a heck of
a time reseeding the forest. As an angler, I should mention that some
forest service idiot decided to introduce Rainbow trout in the 70s and
the trout killed off all the cutthroat species of fish.
So
what is the purpose of spending more money to take a census relating to
use of the National Parks? Maybe we could trim a $billon from the
deficit and let nature take its course. Wildlife would be better off
and so would we.
I am
sure all of you love your dogs and have been to a State or National
Park. It is part of our heritage. You probably don’t think much about
the first-time mother wolf trying to find a suitable place to den up for
birthing. It hardly exists. In summer Yellowstone welcomes over
three million park visitors. There are photos all over the net
showing bison on Yellowstone’s roadways. Nothing much perturbs a
buffalo but the elk all moved up to Elkton, North Dakota. The animals
don’t get any peace in winter either. With the first big snowfall, more
than 125,000 snowmobiles hit the backwoods.
So
the 2011 National Parks census job is underway but I’m sure the
government can afford it. They aren’t planning to trim the budget that
much. Hey Mr. Bison, move over for the tourists so they can be counted!
http://www.thedogpress.com/Columns/Wildlife-Tax-1104_Harper.asp |