State-by-State coverage by NPP Legislative Liaison Ken Sondej
4winds@viawest.net – AKC and Silver State KC Legislative Liaison – Nevada
Dog Fanciers Assc. Director Government Affairs and Legislative Advisor – Adopt A
Rescue Pet, Advisor – Indiana Animal Owners Alliance and to Clubs and groups in
Southern Nevada, Arizona, California Co-contributor and NPP Legislative Editor: Linda D. Witouski
dropfred13@aol.com, AKC Judge, AKC Delegate – Myrtle Beach SC KC –American
Kennel Club Legislative Liaison for SC and PA, and Member: NAIA, MOF, ERPT, DSJA,
DJAA, MBKC, YMPC, MPCA.
Union Gap,
WASHINGTON forbids ROOSTERS!
If you live in
Union Gap, you might wonder what in the world "possessed"
Mayor Jim Lemon and the city council. Among changes to the
code which seems less restrictive for dog owners than for someone
trying to raise a few chickens. That's hard to do without a
rooster but by Jim and by George, no roosters are allowed!
That's right, you can
own up to four hens and four rabbits on lots less than one-half acre
but roosters are prohibited outright.
Marshfield, WISCONSIN goes HI-TECH
Marshfield
has a "poop control device."That's right and if you
go over the limit, the animal control
officer may come out and inspect you, err, well, your yard that is.
They have a "poop wand" which they wave over the ground to determine
if you pick up poop on a timely basis so it doesn't seep into the
ground. It also indicates how many pets you have because if
you're hiding more than 2 dogs or 2 cats, you could be in big
trouble. Yep, that's your Poop Patrol at work monitoring our
every move and spending taxpayer dollars on pricey gadgets.
New-found MONEY for POLITICIANS
Just
impose higher fees, penalties, and fines. As you scroll
through the state listings, you'll become aware of a whole new state
of mind for balancing the budget. Animal owners have suddenly
become a new source of revenue. First they denigrate pet
owners (even new license plates proclaiming "spay and neuter") and
then, having labeled them as second-class citizens, make them pay
more into the system than other tax payers. Pet owners are
fair game!
Continue down the page for more state by state listings of legislation
that affects you. Also at the end of the page, you will find what's
going on in other countries. Other countries are fighting
Legislative Terrorism!
Abbreviations code: BSL =
Breed Specific Legislation, i.e. banning certain breeds or mixed breeds of type.
MSN = Mandatory Spay and Neuter. DD = Dangerous or Vicious Dog under local
definition. * *TA = Text
Available by Request,
email Sondej or Witouski.
FOOD, CONSERVATION, AND ENERGY ACT OF 2008 - from the committee
of conference, submitted the following
CONFERENCE REPORT [To accompany H. R. 2419]
The above Farm Bill
is 673 pages.
http://agriculture.house.gov/inside/Legislation/110/FB/Conf/CRlang.pdf
Included in it are the following sections of importance to the dog community -
Section 14207: Prohibitions on Dog Fighting Ventures which can be found on
pages 582 & 583. The other is Section 14210 regarding Importation of Live Dogs and can
be found on page 585. We've included only the section on importation here. In
order to assist in supporting the bill, please go to the NAIA Trust website
at:
http://capwiz.com/naiatrust/issues/alert/?alertid=11152626&type=CO and
make use of the CapWiz tool.
Read the AKC Farm Bill Update (5/16/08) at: http://www.akc.org/news/index.cfm?article_id=3504
SEC. 14207.
PROHIBITIONS ON DOG FIGHTING VENTURES. - pages 582 & 583
SEC. 14210IMPORTATION OF LIVE
DOGS - page 585 (a)
IN GENERAL.—The Animal Welfare Act is amended by adding after section 17 (7
U.S.C. 2147) the following:
‘‘SEC. 18. IMPORTATION OF LIVE DOGS.
‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
‘‘(1) IMPORTER.—The term ‘importer’ means any person who, for purposes of
resale, transports into the United States puppies from a foreign country.
‘‘(2) RESALE.—The term ‘resale’ includes any transfer of ownership or control of
an imported dog of less than 6 months of age to another person, for more than de
minimis consideration.
‘‘(b) REQUIREMENTS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), no person shall import a
dog into the United States for purposes of resale unless, as determined by the
Secretary, the dog—
‘‘(A) is in good health;
‘‘(B) has received all necessary vaccinations; and
‘‘(C) is at least 6 months of age, if imported for resale.
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, by regulation, shall provide an exception to
any requirement under paragraph (1) in any case in which a dog is imported for—
‘‘(i) research purposes; or ‘‘(ii) veterinary treatment.
‘‘(B) LAWFUL IMPORTATION INTO HAWAII.—Paragraph (1)(C) shall not apply to the
lawful importation of a dog into the State of Hawaii from the British Isles,
Australia, Guam, or New Zealand in compliance with the applicable regulations of
the State of Hawaii and the other requirements of this section, if the dog is
not transported out of the State of Hawaii for purposes of resale at less than 6
months of age.
‘‘(c) IMPLEMENTATION AND REGULATIONS.—The Secretary, the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Secretary of Homeland
Security shall promulgate such regulations as the Secretaries determine to be
necessary to implement and enforce this section.
‘‘(d) ENFORCEMENT.—An importer that fails to comply with this section shall—
‘‘(1) be subject to penalties under section 19; and
‘‘(2) provide for the care (including appropriate veterinary care), forfeiture,
and adoption of each applicable dog, at the expense of the importer.’’.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) takes effect on the
date of the enactment of this Act.
S2831
- Senator Seeks New Regulations for Charities
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.2831:
A key senator wants
to give the Federal Trade Commission the power to regulate nonprofit
organizations including penalizing charities that say in their fund-raising
appeals they are raising money for a particular cause but devote very little of
it to that purpose. The effort by Sen. Byron L. Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat,
is the first stab at putting the brakes on nonprofit organizations that spend a
very low percentage of the money they raise on their charitable missions.
A provision on the
regulation of nonprofit groups was included in legislation to extend the Federal
Trade Commission bill,
S. 2831http://thomas.loc.gov/?d110:s.02831:, that is being considered by the
Interstate Commerce, Trade and Tourism Subcommittee, which Senator Dorgan
chairs.
The provision’s
impact goes beyond fund raising. It directs the Federal Trade Commission to
protect consumers from “unfair and deceptive” practices by charities in the same
way that it regulates such practices by businesses, says Justin Kitsch, Senator
Dorgan’s communications director. Federal Trade Commission officials said in a
hearing on the bill that the provision would enable them to challenge
price-fixing or other anticompetitive practices by nonprofit hospitals, for
example. Anthony Conway, executive director of the Alliance of Nonprofit
Mailers, says he thinks the provision is unnecessary. “There’s already plenty of
oversight and regulatory-body scrutiny of nonprofits,” he says. “I don’t think
adding another layer of oversight is needed, and I’m not sure it would be
beneficial.”
http://philanthropy.com/news/government/4492/senator-seeks-new-regulators-for-charities
TOLLFREE
NUMBERS for the Capitol Switchboard: 1-866-220-0044; 1-866-340-9281;
1-877-851-6437; 1-888-355-3588; 1-800-833-6354; 1-800-450-8293; 1-877-762-8722;
1-877-762-8762
ALABAMAhttp://www.legislature.state.al.us/
Dothan - Dothan residents
are one step closer to having new requirements for pet owners in the
city. The Animal Control Ordinance Committee is set to approve several
mandates for pet owners. Monday night,(5/12/08) they expect their
changes to pass a committee vote so the ordinance can be presented to
the city commission for a final decision. The document is lengthy and it
has many revisions, but Dothan’s new animal ordinance is ready for a
vote by the Animal Ordinance Committee. The most notable items are laws
governing annual registration of pets, spay and neutering requirements,
and dangerous dog guidelines. Tuscaloosa - Several
other states already have license plates that promote spaying and
neutering. The Alabama VMA, along with other animal groups, lobbied the
Alabama Legislature for a year and a half to get the license plate
established. The Legislature approved the plate last year and pre-sales
began in October. Before the license plates can go into production
the state requires that a minimum of 1,000 be pre-sold. Drivers can
order a plate by paying the fee and filling out an Intent to Purchase
form. So far, only 300 have been purchased. Animal groups are striving
to spread the word and sell another 700 by Oct. 31 this year. If 1,000
aren't presold by that date, the plates will not be printed and the
money will be refunded, ending a program that could have altered
thousands of pets before it even begins. ALASKA
http://w3.legis.state.ak.us/ SB273 - An Act
relating to cruelty to animals and promoting an exhibition of fighting
animals. Cruelty to animals under (a)(1), (3), or (4) of this section is
a class C felony. Cruelty to animals under (a)(2) of this section is a
class A misdemeanor. In addition to these penalties, the court may also
(1) require forfeiture of any animal affected to the state or to a
custodian that supplies shelter, care, or medical treatment for the
animal; (2) require the defendant to reimburse the state or a custodian
for all reasonable costs incurred in providing necessary shelter, care,
veterinary attention, or medical treatment for any animal affected; (3)
prohibit or limit the defendant's ownership, possession, or custody of
animals for up to 10 years. UPDATE: Died in House ARIZONA http://www.azleg.gov/
Page - City police announced this week a tightening of animal
control ordinances, including the introduction of a dog-leash law. Seven
significant upgrades in ordinances are in the process of being adopted
by the city council. The Animal Control officer is now called the
Community Resource Officer and duties will be expanded beyond those of
animal control to include parking control. The vehicle will be marked
"Code Enforcement." The penalty for a dog running at large will be $25
for the first offense, $50 for the third and $100 for the fourth
offense. A new "public nuisance" cat ordinance will prohibit cat owners
from having their animals run-at large, damage, defile or soil public or
private property. Owners whose animals are taken to the Page Animal
Shelter will be charged a flat fee of $30 for care and upkeep until the
animal is returned. Owners of cats running at large that are also "in
heat" will be fined. To keep the stray population down and to control
damage caused by dogs running loose, a leash law has been adopted. Any
dog being walked by its owner or controlling person must be on a leash.
Anyone with questions is asked to contact the police department. The
Community Resource Officer will answer any questions.
ARKANSAS
http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/ Crosset - City Council again delayed
adopting an animal control ordinance Monday, March 24. Instead, aldermen
agreed that the animal control committee, Chief of Police Tommy Sturgeon
and Jeff Harrison, public works director, meet prior to the next council
meeting to review the existing ordinance and the committee's proposal to
make sure the next draft before the council covers all areas of concern. Colt - The Colt City Council is considering instituting a vicious
dog ordinance after a pair of recent incidents involving one animal in
the community. The city has a leash law, which requires that dogs be
kept either on a leash or inside a fence, but the city does not have an
ordinance against vicious dogs. Council members discussed the
possibility of creating an ordinance similar to vicious dog ordinances
in surrounding communities and also discussed making the city’s leash
law more stringent. City attorney Steve Routon, agreed to present the
council with an ordinance at its June meeting. Gurdon - Due to an increase in the population of pit bulls in the
city, Gurdon animal control officer Ty Oppelt spoke with the Gurdon City
Council Monday, April 21, about passing new ordinances. Oppelt said that
since cities like Arkadelphia and Little Rock have put into effect stiff
rules and fines for pit bull owners in February, many owners in that
city have simply abandoned or dumped off their dogs. Some of the
ordinances passed in Arkadelphia include: -Having the dog spayed or
neutered, -Having a minimum of $100,000 worth of home insurance -Keeping
the dog fenced in. A fence must be two foot below ground in dirt, or the
fence wire must be two inches below concrete -After vaccinating the dog,
it must be registered at the city hall -Installing a microchip under its
skin -In order to walk a pit bull, one must be 21 years old or older and
the dog must have a muzzle and a sturdy leash . “We have way too many of
them,” Oppelt said, “and they’re causing a lot of problems.” To curb the
influx of pit bulls, Oppelt asked the council if the city could pass
ordinances on the dogs. The next council meeting is scheduled for May 19
at 7 p.m. Jonesboro (Kait) - "Cruelty is cruelty, regardless of what animal
it is," said Northeast Arkansans' for Animal's spokesperson, Wannda
Turner. Some would say cruelty to animals is becoming more and more
prevalent in Arkansas. There continue to be efforts made to get tougher
penalties for people convicted of aggravated animal cruelty. "Beef up
our current laws so that they are stronger, they are more deterrent for
people to do it, and also gives us an opportunity to have felony
charges," said Turner. What we're looking for, and what we're hoping to
prosecute is cruelty that someone knows is cruelty, that can easily be
proved as cruelty," said Turner. Little Rock - Gov. Mike Beebe is trying to convince opponents of
efforts to toughen animal cruelty laws to change their minds. Beebe says
he tends to favor a first-offense felony animal-cruelty law, although he
has to review the previous failed legislation to say which measure he
definitely supports. Currently, the crime is a misdemeanor punishable by
up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine. UPDATE: The battle between pit
bull owners and those wanting tougher restrictions on the dog breed
continues. Several communities including Beebe, Lonoke, Jacksonville and
North Little Rock all have city ordinances enforcing restrictions on pit
bulls. But the city of Little Rock is trying something different. It
requires pit bull owners to register their dogs, or face losing the
animals or paying fines. UPDATE: Owners have only registered a
handful of the estimated thousands of pit bulls in the city and they
have until May 21st to avoid any penalties. Sherwood - City Council updated its 20-year ban on pit bulls and
other vicious animals Monday (04/28/08) night. The updated ordinance
reflects “current standards for responsible pet owner... and provide a
level of enforcement capabilities that will better protect the health,
safety and welfare of our citizens and innocent animals from
irresponsible owners.” The new version gives marauding animals “that
growl, charge, bite or attempt to bite or display extreme fear of
people” just two days to be claimed by their owners or face “humane
euthanasia.” The ordinance specifically bans the pit bull terrier breed,
the Staffordshire bull terrier, the American pit bull terrier, the
American Staffordshire terrier, the American bulldog or mixed breed that
is predominantly pit bull.
West Memphis - (4/23/2008) West Memphis Police want to ban or limit
Pit Bulls from the city. They say too many officers have been attacked
by the dogs when responding to calls and it's time to take action.
CALIFORNIA
http://www.legislature.ca.gov/
CA SPECIAL NOTE: Stuart Waldman is running for California Assembly (Van
Nuys) to take over Lloyd Levine's former seat. He has aligned himself
with responsible dog breeders and has openly opposed AB 1634. Levine, in
turn, has endorsed another candidate to replace him rather than allow
Stuart any success in the District. As you might consider supporting
Fran Pavley's bid for the Senate, you might also consider support for
Stuart Waldman for the Assembly. Stuart Waldman is definitely a friend
and will be an actual advocate in the legislature. Please consider
sending $16.34 to Stuart Waldman's campaign. He will definitely know who
it is from! His website is
www.stuartwaldman.com
AB1760 - would amend the Veterinary Practice Act to facilitate licensing
of out of state veterinarians to address the California shortage,
specifically food animal practice being critical to food safety has
moved along without opposition. Status: Senate Committee on B.P. & E.D.
to be heard on May 12. Re-referred.
AB1938 - would authorize a credit against that tax for each taxable year
beginning on or after January 1, 2008, in an amount equal to 25% of the
aggregate amount paid or incurred by a taxpayer for qualified costs, as
defined, to spay or neuter a cat or dog and would take effect
immediately as a tax levy. Status: Suspense File Assembly Committee on
Revenue & Taxation for which the release hearing is May 12.
AB2131 - to add Section 54.25 to the Civil Code to permit a peace
officer assigned to a canine unit, who is on official assignment for
travel away from his or her home jurisdiction, to be accompanied in
those places by his or her peace officer dog without paying an extra
charge and amend Penal Code Section 365.5 to create a crime of
interfering with or preventing such officer from these rights.
AB2132 - would amend and add to the Fish and Game Code to require signs
forbidding trespass to be at least 8-1/2 by 11 inches in size, make it
unlawful for a person to remove any collar from a hunting dog with the
intent to prevent or hinder the owner from locating the dog and require
the Fish and Game Commission to consider adopting regulations that
permit, during archery season, the use of one dog per hunter to aid in
the recovery of deer. Passed
AB2233 - to add Section 23118 to the Vehicle Code, "A person shall not
drive a motor vehicle while holding a live animal in his or her arm or
arms, or upon his or her lap" creates only an infraction offense with
minor costs. Passed
AB2291 - approved by the Committee on Revenue and Taxation (04/14/08)
sponsored by Concerned Dog Owners of California, introduced by Assembly
Member Tony Mendoza, supported by dog clubs, individuals and humane
organizations. The bill adds a check off box to the California Income
Tax Form so each year we can all contribute $1 for a voluntary spay and
neuter fund. HSUS opposes this bill.
AB2296 - was amended to a criminal bill based on an expansive definition
of "animal enterprise" and offenses of disclosing information to harass
those involved such as posting on the internet personal information
about animal researchers. Bill was greatly scaled back to narrow the
definition of animal enterprise as "an entity that lawfully uses animals
or animal products for education or research in any exercise of a
constitutional right that relates to academic freedom" and provide only
civil remedies for employees of the animal enterprise. Status: on the
Assembly Floor as amended. Passed.
AB2427 - prohibiting licensed veterinarians or anyone else from
declawing cats and restricts local governments from prohibiting groups
of persons authorized by one of the agencies in the Department of
Consumer Affairs (DCA) by a license, certificate, or other such means to
engage in a particular business, from engaging in their business,
occupation, profession, or from engaging in any act or series of acts
that fall within the statutory or regulatory definition of that
business, occupation, or profession, as defined by state law.
AB2949 - An act to amend Sections 1815, 1816, and 1981 of the Civil
Code, relating to involuntary deposits. This bill would provide that an
involuntary deposit is made by the abandonment or leaving of a live
animal in or about any premises or real property that has been vacated
upon, or immediately preceding, the termination of a lease or other
rental agreement or foreclosure of the property. The bill would
authorize any person or private entity with whom a live animal is
involuntarily deposited to immediately transfer the animal to any animal
control agency or shelter for proper care and attention, or to notify
animal control officials for the purpose of retrieving the animal.
SB1205 - amended and add to the Veterinary Practice Act a number of
provisions, originating from the California Veterinary Medical
Association and opposed by the California Veterinary Medical Board and
the California Registered Veterinary Technicians Association Status:
failed on April 14 in the Senate Committee on Business, Professions and
Economic Development. Failed passage in Committee.
SB1527 - to require sale of the Cow Palace in Daly City for development
was amended to allow sale to Daly City of only a 13 acre parcel, thus
saving the facility, for now, although the two AKC Obedience clubs
holding trials there have decided to leave. Passed.
SB1548 - amends and adds to the Veterinary Practice Act related to
Veterinary Medical Board requirements and authorized fees.
SB1775 - would have added a Section 598.1 to the Penal Code imposing
property forfeiture provisions in connection with dog fighting crimes.
Status: Failed Bakersfield - City Council will hold off on the issue of spaying
and neutering pets until Kern County moves farther along in its process.
Laurie Weir, a member of the county’s Animal Control Commission and wife
of Councilman Ken Weir, said the city should instead hire workers to go
door-to-door looking for unlicensed dogs. Getting unlicensed dogs
licensed would generate enough money to pay for the workers, she said
she was speaking for herself and not for the commission. Councilwoman
Sue Benham, who chairs the Legislative and Litigation Committee, said
enforcing the licensing law is just not a priority for a city with
limited resources. The city chooses to actively enforce laws against
drunk driving and graffiti, she said, while enforcing others on a
complaint-driven basis. Butte County - Board of Supervisors, after previously rejecting a
79-page re-write of the entire county animal ordinance, on May 6 again
considered and passed the first reading of an ordinance limited to
"nuisance" issue changes to the County animal ordinance, including an
entirely new civil complaint procedure for barking dogs and prohibiting
"catteries" based on parcel-size specific definitions with no apparent
procedure to permit current excess numbers or future private or
commercial boarding catteries. Calaveras County - San Andreas - County Board of Supervisors
voted 4-0 on Tuesday (05/06/08), in favor of revising the county's
animal ordinances to require the chips for adoptions and for any dogs
deemed by a court to be dangerous or vicious. In June, the new rules
will increase the basic adoption fee at the shelter to $17 for cats and
$27 for dogs. Pet owners who want a chip implanted and registered for
animals they already own can also get that service for $12. Escondido - City officials said Monday they're considering
several new regulations aimed at identifying all of the city's violent
dogs and exactly where they live in Escondido, similar to how Megan's
Law identifies sex offenders. The new ordinances and policies would give
Escondido by far the strictest dog regulations in the county, according
to officials from both the Escondido Humane Society and the county
Department of Animal Control. City Council members and animal control
officials said the proposals were worth considering, but they also
expressed skepticism. City Council members said they were leery of
continually using legislation to solve the city's problems, and animal
control officials said the proposals would be labor-intensive and
costly. Laguna Woods - The Laguna Beach Animal Services, which the city
contracts with to provide animal control, has a maximum one cat one dog
per household. The ownership limit is not currently enforced in Laguna
Woods, but the Blue Ribbon group is considering making it a mandate for
Laguna Woods residents as well. If the group decides to support pet
population limitations, it will also consider what owners with more than
one dog and one cat would be required to do such as setting a time
within which an owner would need to get rid of extra pets or whether a
kennel license at higher cost could be issued until the number of pets
dwindles due to adoption or through death of the excess pets. Other
proposals the group will consider are the following-Mandatory spay
neuter of pets - Mandatory licensing of cats - A barking dog ordinance
to fine owners whose pets are frequent offenders - A pet education
program - A resource guide for pet owners - And other changes to current
service levels. Residents with and without pets are welcome to attend.
For further information, call City Hall, 949-639-0500. Nevada County - The Nevada County Sheriff's Office will outline
the successful Krea Spay Neuter Fund program for the county supervisors
today (4/22/08) at the regular board meeting that starts at 9 a.m. at
The Rood Center in Nevada City. In a letter to the board, Sheriff Keith
Royal said the program started last year "is working well," and is "very
financially beneficial to many Nevada County residents." The program
funded by $197,000 from the estate of Nickolaus Krea allows the county
to give out vouchers to residents to help pay for a spay or neutering
procedure with area veterinarians or animal clinics. Pasadena - City Council meeting agenda items include the first
reading of a proposed ordinance requiring the spaying or neutering of
all pit bulls (05/05/08) The ordinance would take advantage of the 2005
SB 861 state Senate bill passed in 2005 that allows cities to regulate
dogs based on breed. UPDATE: City Council did not proceed with the first
reading of a proposed SB 861 (2005) authorized breed specific ordinance.
Referred to the Council's Public Safety Committee for further
discussion. (05/05/08) Sacramento - Judie Mancuso, Campaign Director for California
Taxpayers for Safe & Healthy Pets, a group working to pass a tax-saving
spay and neuter bill that would help government enforce the BOE
regulation, said the BOE action "will give the pet breeding industry no
excuse to skip out on their taxes, and will help bring puppy mills ---
like the ones on the recent Oprah show -- out of the darkness and into
the light." Mancuso is a co-sponsor of Assembly Bill 1634 California
Healthy Pets Act carried by Assemblyman Lloyd Levine (D-Van Nuys), which
has passed the full Assembly and is awaiting a hearing in the Senate.
Santa Barbara - County Board of Supervisors has set a May 6
public hearing on a proposed mandatory pet sterilization ordinance as
the culmination of a biased and flawed planning process that pointedly
excluded advocates for dog ownership rights. The result is a stacked
deck based only on the preconceived notions of animal rights activists
and their allies in the sheltering and rescue communities. Because of
this bias against the real stakeholders in this issue (that is, people
who own, raise, breed or compete with dogs), the entire justification
behind the proposed ordinance has been invalidated. The ordinance has
been on the table for more than a year, and has been the subject of
serious planning and discussion in recent months due to Judy Mancuso (CA
AB1634 fame). This process has been almost entirely "under the radar,"
and has been dominated by animal rights activists who are
philosophically opposed to raising or breeding dogs. Ordinary dog
owners, people who raise, show or compete with dogs, and hobby breeders
of purebred dogs, have not been invited to the table. Dog owner advocacy
groups, breed clubs, local dog clubs, and canine registries also have
been effectively iced out. UPDATE: The ordinance that had been drafted
was set aside. Instead, an 11 person commission, which is to be evenly
divided among proponents and opponents will be established and with even
handed input, will work to come up with a solution. COLORADO
http://www.leg.state.co.us/
HB1129 - A BILL FOR AN ACT concerning a prohibition on any requirements
for participation in an Animal Identification System when exhibiting an
animal at the Colorado State Fair and Industrial Exhibitions - mandates
that in order for anyone (this includes 4H kids) to show at the Colorado
State Fair, all animals MUST participate in the National Animal
Identification System administered by the United States Department of
Agriculture or its successor system.
HB1308 - will permit an owner of a companion or assistance animal to
recover damages for loss of companionship if a veterinarian's negligence
causes injury or death to the animal. Such damages are usually available
only to people in close relationships, not animals. Bill was gutted of
all animal rights language in the House Judiciary Committee on 3/12/08.
The bill has passed the House and is currently in the Senate. UPDATE:
Third reading passed Senate 4/29/08 CONNECTICUT
http://www.cga.ct.gov/
HB 5829 - AN ACT CONCERNING THE IMPOUNDMENT OF ROAMING ANIMALS AND
PUBLIC SAFETY. The bill narrows the current law that allows the chief
animal control officer and other animal control officers to impound dogs
or other animals to include only dogs that are roaming; do not have the
required municipal tag or plate on their bodies, or are injured,
neglected, abandoned or cruelly treated. It does not specify how animal
control officers should care for other animals in similar conditions
(e.g., cats, ferrets, and other animals kept as pets). Also includes
provisions for roaming livestock. Wallingford - Dubuc is worried the sound of the wind may be
overshadowed by the echo of barking. On a nearby piece of property two
Hamden residents are hoping to get a special planning and zoning permit
to build a dog kennel, and the public outcry is easily read. Large red
and white signs say "Stop the commercial dog kennel". "They could bark
the entire time, affecting our quality of life." Benson Snaider, the
attorney representing the petitioners, argues the property is already
zoned for such a venture. "It is a rural area, where the zoning
regulations contemplate there will be residential and agricultural uses.
Agricultural uses means farms. It also includes kennels," he said. There
was the hope the Planning & Zoning Commission would vote on the matter
Monday night,((5/12/08) but the question has been raised whether this
issue should be brought before the Wetlands Commission so the hearing
was tabled until next month. DELAWARE
http://legis.delaware.gov/
SB247 - AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO TRUSTS
AND ESTATES AND TITLE 25 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO PROPERTY - -
Section 11 of the bill revises ? 3555 of Title 12 so that it now deals
exclusively with trusts created for the care of animals living at
trustors’ deaths. FLORIDA
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/default.aspx
HB101 - Died in Committee on Agribusiness - Friday, May 2, 2008 Broward County - MOTION TO ADOPT Resolution directing the County
Administrator to publish Notice of Public Hearing to be held on Tuesday,
May 13, 2008, at 2:00 P.M. in Room 422 of the Governmental Center to
consider enactment of a proposed Ordinance, the title of which is as
follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY,
FLORIDA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE BROWARD COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO
ANIMAL CARE AND REGULATION; AMENDING SECTION 4-2 TO INCLUDE IN THE
DEFINITION OF "DANGEROUS DOG" A DOG THAT HAS KILLED A DOMESTIC ANIMAL ON
ONE OCCASION; AMENDING SECTION 4-12 TO IMPOSE THE SAME PENALTIES UPON
DANGEROUS DOGS AND THEIR OWNERS FOR THE DEATH OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS AS
CURRENTLY PROVIDED FOR INJURIES CAUSED TO HUMANS; AMENDING SECTION
4-14.5 TO CLARIFY WHICH ANIMALS ARE SUBJECT TO MUZZLE AND LEASH
REQUIREMENTS; AMENDING SECTION 4-14 TO REQUIRE REPORTING OF ANIMALS THAT
BITE HUMANS AND DOMESTIC ANIMALS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING
FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(Sponsored by Commissioner Ken Keechl) Collier County - Residents say dangerous dogs are terrorizing
neighborhoods in Collier County and people living in Golden Gate Estates
claim the problem is getting worse. County commissioners plan to stiffen
penalties for dog owners - and that could mean possible jail time. Jacksonville - City Council is planning to change the shelter 7
day holding period to three. Miami - Dade County - Outline of updates and revisions of Chapter
V of the Miami Dade County Code as follows: * Dogs, cats, and ferrets
must be vaccinated against the rabies virus beginning at 4 months of
age, and they must be revaccinated as directed by the vaccine
manufacturer (typically, every 1 or 3 years). (Section 5-6). * Dogs must
be licensed every year and must wear their tags at all times. (Section
5-7).
* 4 dogs are allowed to live on residential property that is less than
one acre, 6 dogs on 1 to 2 acres, and 8 dogs on 2 acres or more. Keeping
more than those numbers of dogs on residential property requires a
Kennel license (Sections 5-1 and 5-13). * Dogs are not permitted to roam
free off your private property. They must be leashed at all
times. (Section 5-20) * If you breed pets, you must have a Hobby
Breeder or Kennel license. (Sections 5-1 and 5-13) * If you sell pets,
you must have a Hobby Breeder or Pet Dealer license (Section 5-10). * If
you sell pets, they must be microchipped and registered to the new owner
and must be sold with an original official certificate of veterinary
inspection. (Section 5-10) * To transport a pet in the back of a
pick up truck, it must be in a secured carrier. See Section 5-15 for
other requirements. * Dogs in heat must be confined (Section
5-20.1). * The acquisition or keeping of Pit Bull dogs is prohibited in
Miami-Dade County (Section 5-17.6). * Depriving an animal of food,
water, or adequate shelter is an act of animal cruelty (Section 5-4) *
It is unlawful to allow a dog to commit any nuisance (defecation and/or
urination) on side walk of public street or buildings used in common by
the public. (Section5-20). Pierce County - Under the new dangerous dog ordinance all dogs
would be treated the same regardless of their breed. The ordinance would
address the idea that there are no bad dogs, just bad owners. Dangerous
dog owners would have to fork over a $500 fee each year they own a
dangerous dog, one that has severely injured a person or another animal.
Those owners of dangerous dogs would also have to carry $500,000 in
liability insurance. The ordinance makes it mandatory to have a
dangerous dog tattooed or chipped so that animal control in a new
location could be alerted to the dog’s history would assist in the
public’s protection. Ordinance was passed and it awaiting Pierce County
Executive John Ladenburg to signs it into law. Volusia - County Council will be holding a workshop on a
spay/neuter ordinance on May 1, 2008 UPDATE: Proposed MSN ordinance
discussed won't apply to residents inside city limits -- though county
officials say they hope cities will adopt similar provisions once the
county's operation is up and running. For pet owners in unincorporated
parts of the county, the new ordinance includes several provisions: Any
dog or cat older than six months would be sterilized, unless it meets
the criteria for an exception. Those criteria include animals intended
to be shown or bred, animals that are too old or sick to undergo the
operation, or working dogs used by police or the disabled. Unaltered
dogs or cats meeting one of those exceptions would be required to wear a
county-issued tag and be microchipped for identification. The tag would
be available at no cost; microchips cost about $20. Spayed/neutered
animals would not be required to wear tags. GEORGIA
http://www.legis.state.ga.us/
HB301 - Sponsored by state Rep. Bobby Reese (R-Sugar Hill), HB 301 makes
it illegal in Georgia to own, transport or sell dogs or to advertise,
promote or attend a dogfight. In a compromise, the new law treats
attendance at a dogfight as a misdemeanor rather than a felony on the
first arrest. That's the law's chief weakness since the industry
flourishes because there's an eager audience for watching dogs tear each
other apart. Target the spectators with stiff penalties, and dog fighting
would disappear. The passage of the bill reflects four years of effort
by state Sen. Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock), who was on hand at the Capitol
for the signing last week. IDAHO
http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/
The Idaho Legislature is now in the interim between legislative
sessions. Working out of their homes and businesses rather than the
Capitol Annex, legislators will be meeting with constituents and
participating in interim committees and task forces in preparation for
the 2009 legislative session. Boise - Dog owners used to letting their pets run free on the
popular foothills trails outside Boise may face leash laws. The
Foothills Dog Policy Working Group has recommended requiring leashes for
dogs because they say dog owners aren't picking up droppings left by
their trail hiking buddies. The Foothills Conservation Advisory
Committee is meeting Wednesday in Boise to discuss the idea. Some dog
owners aren't pleased. Susan Marston says more than 2,300 people have
signed an online petition asking that the Advisory Committee delay
considering the working group's recommendations to allow more public
comment. UPDATE: The citizens panel early Wednesday morning heard a
recommendation for harsher leash laws throughout the Foothills. In the
end, the panel opted for a cooling off period to enforce the rules
already in place and evaluate the results before making any dramatic
changes. The Boise Foothills Conservation Advisory Committee will ask
the Boise City Council for money to fund police enforcement of existing
dog leash laws and trail-use rules for the Boise Foothills. The city
will also take some time to try to educate dog owners to clean up after
their canine companions, and wants a citizens' group to consider peer
enforcement of the rules. UPDATE: 5/14/08 - Dog owners want to educate
each other before they all lose out. Konvalinka, group organizer, says
everyone has a right to the space and they need to work together to
preserve it for future enjoyment. She hopes the group can educate their
fellow dog owners reminding them to leash and pick up. She’d also like
the group to act as a liaison between dog owners and the city in the
future. Spaulding County - Spalding County's Board of Commissioners (BOC)
will soon be acting on an animal limit law for the county. The animal
care and control advisory board will have one more meeting on the
subject, after which they will have to make their recommendation to the
BOC and the BOC will take action. The animal care and control advisory
board will meet on Monday, May 12 at 5:00 p.m. at the Spalding County
courthouse annex. THE NEXT SCHEDULED BOC MEETING FOLLOWING SUBMISSION OF
THE ADVISORY BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION WILL BE ON MONDAY, MAY 19. IT IS
LIKELY THAT THE BOC WILL TAKE ACTION REGARDING THE ANIMAL LIMIT LAW AT
THAT MEETING.
ILLINOIS
http://www.ilga.gov/ Chicago - Ald. Ed Burke plans to introduce a City Council
ordinance demanding the mandatory sterilization of any dog or cat over 6
months old living in Chicago. Exceptions would be animals belonging to
licensed breeders, law enforcement dogs and vet exemptions for animals
due to health reasons. Penalties would be monetary, and the ordinance
would call for criminal background checks for breeders seeking a new
license or license renewal. Burke wants to stem the tide of Chicagoans
mauled by pit bulls and those breeding dogs to fight. The city's
underfunded Animal Care and Control unit doesn't have enough workers to
respond to dog-mauling reports and is working with Burke on new
legislation. Roscoe - Billy Weston, Roscoe police officer and the village’s
code enforcement officer has put forth a new set of regulations that
better defines what animals people can have in town, how many they can
have and what penalties they face if they violate the new rules. Members
of the village’s Public Safety Committee were handed a version of the
proposed new ordinances Tuesday night (3/11/08) and asked by chairman
Scott Richardson to read, compare and make changes where necessary
before they discuss the changes at the next committee meeting. Also
cited as issues that should also be addressed - neighbors who would not
clean up the dog waste in their yards to what one called irresponsible
pet owners who would leave their animals chained outside all day while
they were at work. “Our ordinances are really vague as far as animals
go,” Richardson said. “The new ones, would address many issues.” It
could be several weeks before the document reaches the full Village
Board for a vote.
INDIANA
http://www.in.gov/legislative/
Marion - A new animal shelter could mean new animal control laws,
city leaders say. How laws could curb the animal population, abuse and
neglect problems in the city was discussed Tuesday 4/15/08 at the
ordinance committee meeting of the Marion City Council. Several people
from the board of the Marion-Grant County Humane Society were present.
Wright said the law needs to be reviewed. “It may have been the wrong
way to approach it the last time,” Wright said before showing people a
slideshow of photos around Marion of animals neglected or abused.
IOWA
http://www.legis.state.ia.us/
ALERT! TO ALL DOG OWNERS IN IOWA There are currently News Media outlets
in Iowa, predominately in the North and Eastern Portions of Iowa,
attempting to portray Dog Owners in Iowa as an ALLEGED MAJOR SOURCE OF
PUPPY MILL DOGS! Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom is ALERTING ALL IOWA DOG
OWNERS that this is allegedly 'False' with no proven foundation of
specific facts, and an alleged organized PUPPY MILL PROPAGANDA PLOY to
force the Iowa Legislators to put more "tyranny' and "control' over your
ownership of dogs. Please contact Animals C.L.U.B,.- Freedom with
any and all information regarding this alleged Propaganda Stunt by Iowa
Media and Humane Society outlets and their associates, to CONTROL ALL
DOG OWNERS THRU FEAR AND INTIMIDATION with the Animal Control Laws. Des Moines - Gov. Chet Culver has signed into law a measure that
toughens penalties for people who watch dog fights. Under the new law
signed on Wednesday, someone convicted of being a spectator at a dog
fight could be sentenced to five years in prison and fined $7,500. It
also applies to any event where animals are injured, tortured or killed.
The Animal Rescue League of Iowa and the Humane Society backed the
measure, saying it's unclear how big the problem of dog fighting is in
Iowa. It was one of 17 bills the governor signed. Mason City - Big money is being made at puppy mills in Iowa,
which by many accounts has one of the highest concentrations in the
nation. A bill brought before the Iowa Legislature which would have
limited a kennel to 20 breeding dogs was discussed this past session but
did not pass.
KANSAS
http://www.kslegislature.org/legsrv-legisportal/index.do Wichita - The ordinance went into effect in December, 2007 -
requiring dog breeders to purchase a license. The ordinance says people
have to buy a $50 annual license to breed dogs, but it doesn't define
what a breeder is. As a result, the ordinance applies to anyone whose
dog has puppies in the city of Wichita. The ordinance was aimed at puppy
mills and pit bulls, said Kay Johnson, director of the city's department
of environmental services. The city acknowledges the ordinance needs
tweaking because it wasn't intended to be so sweeping.
KENTUCKY
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/
SB 206 - Amend KRS 258.117 to add two members nominated by the Humane
Society of the United States to the Animal Control Advisory Board. Boone County - Hebron - County Commissioners have mixed feeling
regarding a possible ordnance concerning pit bulls and Rottweilers Louisville - A Jefferson circuit judge heard arguments yesterday
over whether the current version of Louisville's dangerous-dog law
should be discarded. In February Judge Martin McDonald threw out two
older versions of the law, ruling that the December 2006 version was
passed after the Democratic caucus of the Louisville Metro Council met
without notifying the public of a location change. He also struck down
amendments to that law, passed in April 2007, on grounds that they
changed a version he had invalidated. McDonald did not say when he would
rule. UPDATE: Louisville's dangerous-dog law has been declared valid by
a judge who ruled yesterday (5/9/08) that it was properly passed by the
Metro Council on Dec. 20. A lawsuit pending in federal court challenging
the ordinance's constitutionality can now move forward.
LOUISIANA
http://www.legis.state.la.us/
HB 1193 - Provides for kennel licenses for dog breeders. Requires
individuals or businesses with more than five dogs that breed and sell
retail, wholesale or to the public to procure kennel licenses and pay
kennel fees instead of individual dog license fees. Prohibits an
individual or business that breeds, buys or sells dogs from maintaining
more than 75 dogs over the age of one year at any time for breeding
purposes. Provides for violations. UPDATE: The House Agriculture
Committee on Wednesday (5/14/08) advanced legislation aimed at making it
illegal for puppy mill owners to maintain more than 75 breeding dogs.
The Humane Society of the United States testified in support of the
legislation. The organization says many puppy mill operators deceive
consumers into believing the dogs came from reputable breeders. Baton Rouge - Motion on dog ban for deer hunting in Kisatchie
fails. Deer hunters using dogs on the sprawling five ranges in the
Kisatchie National Forest were put on notice to abide by trespass laws
along with state and federal hunting regulations or risk losing their
hunting privileges for the season. The discussion occupied most of the
time during a recent Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission
meeting. Baton Rouge - The difference between an accident and abuse -
"fly-by-night" groomers who are only in the business for the money.
Redman has already taken an active role. She's pushing for legislation
that would require groomers to meet certain standards. Right now, only
Connecticut, Colorado, and Georgia have laws where groomers are
regulated by the U.S. Humane Society. Several other states are
considering doing the same. Louisiana is not one of them - yet. Lafayette - A legal showdown is underway in Lafayette. A group is
claiming Lafayette's Animal Control is "mismanaged" and they want public
records, so they can prove it. But after more than a year of trying,
there still haven't received the documents they asked for. So Wednesday
both sides headed to court. The Lafayette City-Parish Government is
being asked to produce documents including adoption records, federal
licensing and inspections, anti-cruelty policies, veterinary records, as
well as spay and neuter policies at the Roicy Duhon Animal Control
Center. Rapides Parish - During sometimes tense public discussions with
PAWS officials in March and April committee meetings, most Rapides
Parish Police Jury members, including President Richard Billings, said
the parish doesn't need an ordinance governing animal protection because
a state law already exists. The previous ordinance the parish had was
repealed because the state law already provided one, officials said.
Billings said he thinks PAWS has done a good job protecting animals, but
he has reservations about going too far telling people how to treat
their animals. Billings said most people care for their animals.
MAINE
http://janus.state.me.us/legis/
LD2010 (HP1394) - An act to ensure ethical and humane dog breeding in
the state - PASSED HOUSE & SENATE - 4/10/08. A bill to encourage ethical
dog breeding and discourage puppy mills through a special task force has
been passed by the Legislature. The bill requires the Maine Department
of Agriculture to establish a working group to redefine breeding
kennels, and review the laws and regulations that apply. "This is a
unique opportunity to bring all the stakeholders together, which has
never been done before," Norma Worley, director of Maine’s Animal
Welfare Division, said Monday. The new law requires the task force to
include representatives of groups such as veterinarians, the Humane
Society of the United States, dog and kennel clubs, animal control
officers and dog breeders. The group will submit a report by Jan. 15,
2009.
MARYLAND
http://mlis.state.md.us/
The Maryland General Assembly meets in Annapolis each year for 90 days
to act on more than 2300 bills including the State's annual budget. The
425th Session began January 9, 2008 and adjourned April 7, 2008. Salisbury - Wicomico County - The three-person panel, named in
this week's Wicomico County Council meeting, is part of October
legislation updating how the county addresses animal attacks, said
County Executive Rick Pollitt. Charged with reviewing the severity of a
bite and circumstances of the attack, the panel can recommend
euthanizing an animal after just one bite. To ensure fair discretion,
the panel includes Lt. Tod Richardson of the Wicomico County Sheriff's
Office, Wicomico County Health Officer Lori Brewster and licensed
veterinarian Carol Lewis. The council's next step, which will be
addressed after its June 15 budget deadline, is fine-tuning the October
ordinance, President John Cannon said. "We're not only reviewing
punitive measures against dogs and owners, but we also include measures
to protect dogs," Cannon said. The council might act on the
recommendations of a 10-person committee that, in the past five months,
has reviewed such measures as altering the maximum fines and requiring
animals be added to a dangerous dog registry.
MASSACHUSETTS http://www.mass.gov/
Haverhill - The City Council will hold one more committee meeting
on new laws for dangerous dogs and then vote on a proposal for tougher
rules and penalties in three weeks. "Public Safety can finish the
discussion from last night and come back to us in three weeks," City
Council President Michael Hart said, referring to a standing-room-only
meeting Monday night (5/5/08) at City Hall. The proposal would establish
two categories of canines ? dangerous dogs and potentially dangerous
dogs. Dogs would be deemed dangerous or potentially dangerous by the
city's dog officer or police chief, based on preset criteria. A
dangerous dog is defined in the proposed ordinances as a dog that has
bitten, attacked or terrorized a person, or a dog that is bred for
fighting or drug trafficking. A potentially dangerous dog is a canine
that acts in such an aggressive manner that the dog officer believes the
animal is likely to attack a person. The proposal would give police new
tools to control dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs, the mayor
said. For instance, the police chief or dog officer may order the dog
confined indoors or outdoors in an enclosed pen. Police may also order
the dog's owner to purchase insurance in case the dog attacks and
injures a person, according to the proposal. The ordinance also provides
a $50 licensing surcharge for dangerous dogs. Other measures provided in
the proposal would allow police to order owners of dangerous dogs to
purchase behavioral training for the dog, home signs alerting the area
to the presence of a dangerous dog and microchips to monitor the animal.
Penalties for not following any requirements imposed by the police chief
or dog officer range from $100 to destroying the animal. Lynn - Ward 1 City Councilor Wayne Lozzi is proposing that
landlords take out a $100,000 liability policy for tenants in possession
of violent animals. Lozzi said the proposed amendment is a proactive
approach to potentially control fierce dogs, instead of waiting for an
animal to bite an unsuspecting person.
MICHIGAN
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/ Burton - The City Council gave preliminary approval Monday to a
proposed ban on "exotic, dangerous or undomesticated animals found in
the wilderness" following reports of a wolf dog and an alligator being
kept as pets in the city. A state law already puts restrictions on
keeping some of the animals, but the city's proposal goes further.
Included in Burton's proposed ordinance:
• No warm-blooded, carnivorous or omnivorous, wild or exotic animals,
dangerous or undomesticated animals not considered ordinary house pets.
The ban includes foxes, wild or exotic cats, nonhuman primates,
raccoons, skunks, wolves and wolf dogs.
It also bans spiders or insects that can inflict poisonous bites,
venomous and cold-blooded reptiles, snakes 6 feet long or longer,
crocodiles, piranhas, sharks and other dangerous cold-blooded animals.
Residents have 10 days once the ordinance is enacted to remove banned
animals from the city. Howell - Pit bulls or other "bully breeds" caught running loose
in Livingston County would be euthanized within four days under a
controversial proposal that puts county officials smack in the middle of
the national
debate about what to do about dangerous dogs. "My job is to protect the
citizens," said Livingston Animal Control Director Anne Burns, who
drafted the recommendation. The proposed policy, which comes before the
Livingston County Board of Supervisors on Monday (5/19/08), would end
adoptions at the county-operated animal shelter of pit bull terriers,
American pit bull terriers, American Staffordshire terriers, American
bulldogs and mixes. Livingston County is not the first to adopt a policy
to prevent the adoption
of "bully breeds." Ingham and Genesee counties' animal shelters and
Capital Area Humane Society
in Lansing have similar regulations. Warren - City Council has not yet taken action on the proposed
regulation that would allow residents to have up to three dogs and two
cats, or three cats and two dogs. He said an equal number of canines and
domestic felines should be permitted in each household, up to a total
maximum of six. How many ferrets can we have? How many guinea pigs? At
what point do we stop being so specific? The ordinance also would
prohibit kennels in residential areas.
MINNESOTA
http://www.leg.state.mn.us/leg/legis.asp
SF2876 - The bill won unanimous approval (4/21/08) after discussion
about dog attacks, including one that killed a Minneapolis boy. The main
provision would prohibit dog ownership for at least three years for
those whose dogs hurt or kill someone or when the owners violate laws
requiring restraints, microchips and other precautions. Representative
Michael Paymar says there have been too many problems with dogs biting
and sometimes killing children, adults and other pets. The punishment
would not be linked to the dog's breed. SF3683 - An omnibus bill
addressing (among other things) "requirements for practicing animal
chiropractic care; recognizing a Program for the Assessment of
Veterinary Education Equivalence certification; limiting use of certain
drugs; changing certain requirements; regulating prescription of
veterinary drugs." Signed by the governor 5/12/08. East Bethel - City Council (4/16/08) passed a revised dangerous
dog ordinance. The ordinance adds the definition of "potentially
dangerous dog" and provides a specific impoundment procedure to follow
after a dog bite is reported. Ordinance requires a proper enclosure as
defined, posting warning signs of a dangerous dog on the property,
annually providing proof of public liability insurance paid in fill in
the minimum amount of $300,000, muzzling and restraining the dog with a
chain or leash if it is outside an enclosure, tagging the dog as a
dangerous dog on its collar, prove existence of a microchip
identification in the dog and register the dangerous dog with Anoka
County within 14 days. A "potentially dangerous dog" under the revised
ordinance means any dog that inflicts a bite on a human or domestic
animal on public or private property, chases or approaches a person,
including a person on a bicycle, upon the streets, sidewalks or any
public or private property other than the dog owner's property in an
apparent attitude of attack or has a known propensity, tendency or
disposition to attack causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety
of humans or domestic animals. Sterns - Stearns County may adopt its own restrictions on
dangerous dogs amid concerns that a state law isn’t enforceable. The
county board has scheduled a public hearing to consider an ordinance
regulating dangerous dogs. It likely will resemble the state law, which
requires dogs determined to be dangerous to be registered, identified
with a microchip and confined. Their owners must post a warning sign and
carry liability insurance. In state law, a “dangerous” dog is one
that has “inflicted substantial bodily harm” without provocation, killed
a domestic animal without provocation while off the owner’s property or
has attacked after being declared potentially dangerous. Stearns County
had been using the state law to classify dogs as dangerous after an
attack. However, in light of a recent court case, there’s concern that
the state law isn’t enforceable because it does not allow the dog’s
owner to appeal, said Marcus Miller, assistant county attorney.
MISSOURI
http://www.moga.mo.gov/ Springfield - Area psychologist Neal Cohen will address the
council 4/21/08. He is helping to draw up a petition to bring the idea
of a dog registration system here. He's wanting to put the idea of
"differential registration" to a vote of the people: that is, people who
decide to leave their animals intact, able to breed, would pay a higher
animal registration fee than those who have their animals neutered. "All
I've ever wanted to do is for the City Council to hold people
accountable for decisions made regarding their animals," Cohen says.
MONTANA
http://leg.mt.gov/css/default.asp
The Montana Legislature meets biennially in odd-numbered years. The next
session convenes Jan. 5, 2009.
Missoula - Extra officers are patrolling for leash and waste pick up
laws in Missoula's public parks and trailheads, many dog owners are
still letting their dogs off leashes and not picking up after them. The
Parks Department says dozens of complaints are coming in about too much
dog waste that's keeping children from being able to play in the grassy
areas. One of the complaints says the amount of waste is atrocious.
Parents say they don't mind the dogs being in the park, if everyone
would follow the rules. Extra officers are patrolling parks and
trailheads this week giving out warnings and tickets. Tickets average
sixty-five dollars, but can be up to five hundred dollars for repeat
offenders. (4/29/08)
NEBRASKA
http://www.unicam.state.ne.us/web/public/home Osceola - Will hold a second reading of a proposed ordinance to
ban American pit bull terriers and seven other dog breeds at 7 p.m.
Tuesday (05/12/08) **Note** the seven other breeds were not mentioned in
the article and there is no city website.
NEVADA
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/
NEW JERSEY
http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/
A1583 & A1584 - COHEN/BURZICHELLI/FISHER BILLS TO OUTLAW SURGICAL
MODIFICATION OF DOGS FOR SMUGGLING DRUGS ADVANCES - The Assembly
Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee today released two bills
Assemblymen Neil M. Cohen, John J. Burzichelli and Douglas H. Fisher
sponsored to make surgical modification of dogs and other animals to
serve as drug mules a specific animal cruelty crime. The two-bill
package was introduced in response to a report issued last year by the
Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) that live puppies were being
used to smuggle bags of liquid heroin into the United States during a
January 2005 raid on a clandestine veterinary clinic in Colombia, South
America. Trenton - The Governor of New Jersey intends to close 9+ state
parks in New Jersey. A number of these parks are used for dog shows,
specialties, agility trials, obedience, rally, lure coursing and
specialties, as well as family picnics, horseback riding, swimming,
fishing, hiking, back-packing, bird-watching, skiing, camping, and
re-enactments.
NEW
MEXICO
http://legis.state.nm.us/lcs/
Albequerque - Larren Glover says that his pet shepherd-Labrador
mix died within an hour of being retrieved from Albuquerque’s animal
control shelter and he wants the city’s spay-neuter policy amended.
According to Glover, his dog Chico escaped from his yard when a
utility worker left a gate open and, when animal control picked
Chico up, he was neutered as city police dictates.
NEW
YORK
http://assembly.state.ny.us/
Buffalo - Victims of dog bites calling for dog owner database and
revisions to state law. Under the New York State Agriculture and Markets
Law, a determination is made whether that particular dog involved is
dangerous, and the law doesn't look collectively at all the dogs
involved. Schenectady - The new SPCA branch would have more peace officers
than any other county in New York outside of New York City. Peace
officers have the legal authority to investigate animal abuse charges
and make arrests. They can carry handguns and mace, wear body armor and
charge violators with crimes ranging from violations to felonies, some
punishable by up to four years in prison. They may only exercise their
authority while on duty, though.
Watertown - The owners of a cat killed by neighbors dogs will be
petitioning the Watertown City Council to update the city animal control
ordnances at the next council meeting. They also believe, since the city
contracts with the county for animal control that the Jefferson County
Legislature needs to address the selective enforcement policy of Animal
Control as well. Wheatfield - Residents who run dog kennels or boarding operations
will have to obtain a special use permit under an amendment to the
zoning law that the Town Board adopted Monday night, 4/14/2008
NORTH CAROLINA http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/
The North Carolina Court of Appeals
today (4/15/2008) overturned littering charges against two animal rights
workers in Hertford County who had been convicted last year of the
lesser offenses after a high-profile trial on allegations of animal
cruelty. Essentially, the littering charges against Adria Hinkle and
Andrew Cook were overturned because the prosecution failed to prove that
a Dumpster is not the proper place for trash. Hinkle and Cook were
employed by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals when they were
caught June 15, 2005, dumping euthanized animals into a trash bin at a
shopping center in Ahoskie, N.C. Catawba County - Hickory - Redefined dangerous dog ordinance and
added POTENTIALLY dangerous dog ordinance, "potentially" being an animal
which kills another domestic animal. Cumberland County - Policy committee considers dog-tethering law. Forsyth County - Proposal from the Animal Control Advisory
Board regarding Dangerous Dogs. Iredell County - Commissioners will review a new Animal Control
ordinance, written with the assistance of the Humane Society of Iredell
County. The new ordinance is supposed to provide Animal Control
employees with some clarity on state regulated procedure and matches
general statutes. The new ordinance covers a variety of animal-related
topics, including tethering, dangerous animals and sanitized water
dishes. Kinston - Officials are drafting an ordinance from the mold of many
communities around the nation that have passed laws restricting or
banning pit bull ownership. The ordinance includes a number of measures,
including restricting the number of pit bulls per house, requiring
owners to register their existing pit bulls, and keeping other pit
bulls out of Kinston. Orange County - Hillsborough
- County has tentatively scheduled a public hearing May 20 on a proposal
to limit the chaining or tying up of dogs. The revision to the county's
animal control ordinance would limit how long a dog could be tethered,
create minimum sizes for outdoor pens or enclosures, and regulate the
types of tethers that can be used.
NORTH DAKOTA
http://www.legis.nd.gov/
Kenmare
- New city ordinance in Kenmare is forcing some dog owners to either
part with their pets or leave town with them. Citizen concerns about
potentially vicious dogs in the community, the Kenmare City Council
voted April 14 to ban American Staffordshire terriers, Rottweilers and
Doberman pinschers and any mixture of those breeds. The ordinance
contains no grandfather clause, which means that dogs covered by the
ordinance have 10 days to be removed from town. The city felt it needed
to address concerns of residents about the type of dogs coming into
town, Mayor Roger Ness said. There have been incidents with threatening
dogs, although no one has been bitten. The ordinance doesn't allow the
city to confiscate a dog, although Police Chief Gary Kraft said that is
something that council may choose to add to the ordinance. Minot - Police Department also is looking at what other towns are
doing in preparing revisions to Minot's animal ordinance to present to
the city council. Recently, a Minot resident requested keeping small
goats, which aren't specifically prohibited. The city council denied the
request. Minot's ordinance currently outlaws wolves and pit bulls,
including American Staffordshire terriers and pit bull mixed breeds. OHIOhttp://www.legislature.state.oh.us/ HB71: This bill was passed in amended form in the
House and will be heard in the Senate Agriculture Committee on May 14.
Originally written to tighten laws about impounding fighting dogs and
fighting gamecocks, HB71 was amended in committee to remove due process
for people accused of animal fighting or animal cruelty. Under this
language, animals can be impounded based on reasonable cause (not
probable cause and a court order) and owners have only 10 days to file
for an appeal of the seizure. This presumes that the seized animals have
been evaluated, charges have been filed, the court has set an amount of
a required bond for their care, and the owner has arranged for the bond
during that time. If not, the animals can be euthanized or otherwise
disposed of. A substitute bill is expected at the hearing. HB446
- HB446
hearing scheduled for 4/17/2008 was dropped from the hearing agenda.
Amendments were introduced on May 8 to return to the 3-month age for
licensing puppies, but the 30-day grace period was dropped. Thus it will
become illegal to own a puppy that is one day over three months of age
unless it is licensed. Changes in the requirements for finders of stray
dogs make it more difficult for a dog owner to reclaim his pet. There
were no changes in the requirements to individually license each dog in
a licensed kennel or to mandate that rabies vaccinations be given by a
veterinarian.
UPDATE:
Passed House (10-4). House vote anticipated 5/20/08 SB 173: This kennel licensing bill affects breeders with
more than eight intact dogs in their kennels. It sets up a state
bureaucracy to inspect kennels, requires insurance in case dogs have to
be impounded, and mandates bonds for animal care if the kennel owner
wants to appeal a seizure. It also requires criminal background checks
for license applicants, specifies housing and care requirements that
deny breeders the opportunity to make decisions about bedding, water
dishes, and veterinary care. A substitute bill is expected at a hearing
on May 13. Chagrin Falls - Will be discussing "dangerous dog" legislation
on Monday, May 12, 2008, at 6:30 p.m.. The Safety Committee will hear
from experts and residents of the Village. UPDATE:
The Chagrin Falls' Safety Committee had a meeting earlier this week to
discuss residents' concerns regarding "dangerous dogs." We were
previously told that although pit bulls were the breed to cause the
initial concern, the community was not considering breeds-specific
ordinances. Unfortunately, it appears that targeting pit bulls is
exactly what the resident wants. The next meeting is JUNE 9, 2008 Cincinnati - Confusion over proposed tightening of
Cincinnati's ban on pit bulls Wednesday (5/07/08) led to a one-week
delay on changes that would allow 10 trained police officers to identify
dogs as pit bulls and would order the removal of any dog so labeled. The
new language is simply a first step in a months-long process of studying
how to make the vicious dog law more enforceable. It would order the
training of 10 officers - two in each police district - to identify pit
bulls and follow up on cases. UPDATE: Cincinnati City Council talked for more than half an hour
Wednesday about vicious dogs and pit bulls. On the table for a vote was
an ordinance from Cecil Thomas that would train 10 police officers to
learn to identify pit bulls and order any officer or dog warden to
remove from premises any improperly confined vicious dog or "any dog
identified as a pit bull terrier." It wasn't just the ordinance itself
that prompted the 30-plus minute discussion. Chris Bortz wanted to know
why it didn't say specifically what training the officers would get. He
did most of the questioning and wanted more time to do more, but Mayor
Mark Mallory wouldn't give it to him. Bortz also dropped in a key piece
of info: Harold Dates (he's the CEO of the SPCA, aka the head dog
warden) was against the ordinance too. Council members seemed more
interested in how the ordinance got to the floor of council without
debate first in Thomas' law committee (that's because he didn't have a
quorum there Tuesday afternoon) and without the knowledge of members of
a task force established last fall to study the city's vicious dog law
and make fixes to it. Columbus - The owner of a former North Side kennel removed the cages
from his yard after a judge ruled two months ago that he was violating
city zoning rules. Since then, inspectors have found five more people
illegally running kennels in Columbus residential areas. They also
discovered 25 kennel-permit holders in Columbus who aren't running
kennels. They have so many dogs, though, that buying one kennel license
is cheaper than buying an individual license for each animal. Franklin
County Auditor Joe Testa said he plans to revoke the licenses of those
who aren't running kennels. He cited a 1955 state attorney general's
opinion that if there is reasonable doubt that a kennel exists, he can
require a property owner to prove that it does. Animal control officers
began visiting those people Wednesday. Those who improperly have kennel
licenses will be given until Friday to obtain individual licenses. If
they don't, animal control will file charges that could result in fines
of up to $150 per dog, said David Shellhouse, animal control field
supervisor. Lucas County -The
Lucas County Dog Warden's door-to-door campaign to enforce the state's
dog licensing laws has been put to a temporary halt by the county
commissioners. Commissioner Ben Konop said he wasn't sure if the
door-to-door license checks were a good use of county money - and he was
concerned the random checks might violate protections against
unreasonable search and seizure in the U.S. Constitution. "We all want
to see the laws enforced," Mr. Konop said. "But maybe there are ways you
can do that in a less intrusive manner and a less costly manner." Tina
Skeldon Wozniak, the president of the commissioners, agreed to the
temporary halt. She said she wanted to see if there were better ways to
ensure compliance with dog licensing laws. Reading - City Council is considering an ordinance that would ban all
vicious dogs – including pit bulls – from the city. The ordinance, which
was given its first reading last week, uses the Ohio Revised Code
definition of a vicious dog as one that, without provocation, has killed
or injured a person or another dog, and/or a dog that belongs to a breed
that is commonly known as pit bull. A majority council vote on the third
reading of the proposed ordinance is needed for it to become law. Under
the proposed ordinance, the determination of whether a particular dog is
actually a pit bull would be made by the Society for Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals. Sylvania - city council will consider a vicious dog
ordinance modeled after Toledo's one-dog limit, which was upheld by the
Ohio Supreme Court.UPDATE:
heated
debate in Sylvania at a public meeting (04/06/08) over additional
restrictions on "pit bulls" and vicious dog legislation. FINAL UPDATE:
Monday (4/21/2008) the City of Sylvania made a decision contrary to the
dog warden's recommendation. Council members decided to just stick with
its current laws. Whitehall - Councilwoman Jackie Thompson withdrew a controversial
ordinance that would ban pit bulls in the city (04/15/08). OKLAHOMA
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/ Del City - Pit bull terriers are once again allowed in a metro city,
as Del City officially lifted its ban on the breed. City leaders decided
Monday not to appeal a judge's ruling that its law banning the dogs was
unconstitutional. Midwest City - While Del City's ban is gone, Midwest City
officials are still targeting pit bulls as part of their ban. An
attorney for Midwest City said the city is facing a civil lawsuit. City
leaders there took note of the judge's decision in the Del City case but
are continuing to fight to keep the ban. Ponca City
- Considering Mandatory Spay/Neuter. Shanley Wells-Rau, chairman of the
Animal Control Advisory Board, said the proposed ordinance was intended
to eliminate the financial incentive for irresponsible pet ownership. It
would require pet owners to have animals more than six months old spayed
or neutered or to purchase an intact animal license. The proposed
ordinance includes many exemptions, including exemptions for medical
reasons as determined by a veterinarian, animals who are visiting but do
not live in Ponca City, service animals, police animals and competition
animals. The proposed ordinance also exempts animal owners who are
members of an approved purebred breed club, which maintains and enforces
a code of ethics for breeding that includes restrictions from breeding
animals with genetic defects and life-threatening health problems that
commonly threaten the breed. Breeders also would be required to purchase
a whelping license. Mayor Homer Nicholson said the proposed ordinance
does not interfere with responsible breeders. OREGON http://www.leg.state.or.us/ SB1072
- Ordered by Senate 2/13/08 - Relating to dog fighting; amending ORS
167.360, 167.370 and 167.372; and declaring an emergency. Summary:
Modifies crime of participation in dog fighting. Expands definition of 'dog fighting
paraphernalia'.
Ballot Measure 53
- In response to unanswered questions, the 2007 Legislature worked with
the Oregon Dept. of Justice, the Oregon District Attorneys Association,
the Oregon Chiefs of Police, the Oregon State Sheriffs Association, the
ACLU of Oregon, and the Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association to
develop Ballot Measure 53. If Ballot Measure 53 is adopted, certain
abandoned property and neglected or abused animals can be forfeited
without a conviction. Under Ballot Measure 53, the cash next to
methamphetamines can be forfeited, the pets can be put up for adoption,
and local governments can share in the proceeds for assisting the
federal government.
PENNSYLVANIA http://www.legis.state.pa.us/ HB 499
-
Amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania2
Consolidated Statutes, further providing for the penalties for cruelty
to animals. HB
2525
-
An Act, Amending the act of December 7, 1982 (P.L.784,
No.225), entitled, as amended, "An act relating to dogs, regulating the
keeping of dogs; providing for the licensing of dogs and kennels;
providing for the protection of dogs and the detention and destruction
of dogs in certain cases; regulating the sale and transportation of
dogs; declaring dogs to be personal property and the subject of theft;
providing for the abandonment of animals; providing for the assessment
of damages done to animals; providing for payment of damages by the
Commonwealth in certain cases and the liability of the owner or keeper
of dogs for such damages; imposing powers and duties on certain State
and local officers and employees; providing penalties; and creating
a Dog Law Restricted Account," further providing for definitions, for
issuance of dog licenses, for applications for dog licenses, for
kennels, for requirements for kennels, for out-of-State dealer license,
for bills of sale, for revocation, suspension or refusal of kennel
licenses, for transportation of dogs, for health certificates for
importation, for inspections of premises and dogs and for additional
duties of department; providing for refusal of entry; further providing
for seizure and detention of dogs, for confinement of dogs, for dog
bites, for registration, for certain requirements, for control of
dangerous dogs, for public safety, for selling, bartering or trading
dogs, for damages caused by coyotes, for burdens of proof, for
enforcement, for rules and regulations and for violations; providing for
exemption; further defining "releasing agency"; and making editorial
changes. WARNING:81 pages
long! HB 2532
- Amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania
Consolidated Statutes, further providing for cruelty to animals. (h)
Cropping ears of dog; all docking, debarking, surgical birth, prima
facie evidence of violation. A person commits a summary offense if he
crops or cuts off, or causes or procures to be cropped or cut off, the
whole part or part of the ear or ears of a dog or shows or exhibits or
procures the showing or exhibition of any dog whose ear is or ears are
cropped or cut off, in whole or in part, unless the person showing
the dog has in his possession either a certificate of a veterinarian
stating that the cropping was done by the veterinarian or a certificate
of registration from a county treasurer[,] showing that [such] the dog
was cut or cropped before this section became effective. (3) (i) A
person commits a summary offense if he person docks, cuts off, causes or
procures the docking or cutting off of the tail of a dog over three days
old. (ii) The provisions of this paragraph shall not prevent a
veterinarian from cutting or cropping the whole or part of the tail of a
dog when the dog is anesthetized and shall not prevent a person from
causing or procuring the cutting or docking of a tail of a dog by a
veterinarian. (iii) The possession by a person of a dog with a tail cut
off or docked and with the wound resulting therefrom unhealed shall be
prima facie evidence of a violation of this paragraph by the person
except as provided in this paragraph. Harrisburg
- A western Pennsylvania legislator today (5/13/08) will introduce
long-awaited revisions to Pennsylvania's dog law pushed by Gov. Ed
Rendell, the biggest step forward in a tortuous, two-year-long process
geared toward improving the lot of thousands of dogs in puppy mills.
The legislation, along with revisions to the state's anti-cruelty
statute, will come a day before supporters of the bills rally with their
pets at the Capitol in Harrisburg. ''There will be a lot of dogs,''
said Rendell spokeswoman Teresa Candori. ''The rally has gotten a lot of
attention. We are expecting a couple hundred people.'' Rep. James E.
Casorio Jr., D-Westmoreland, the prime sponsor of the dog law revisions,
did not return messages Monday seeking comment. The anti-cruelty
amendments, sponsored by Rep. Thomas R. Caltagirone, D-Berks, would
increase fines and require dog owners to pay for the cost of keeping
seized dogs in shelters, unless the owners relinquish the pets. Erie -
Animal-control officials with the state and city of Erie will start
canvassing the city and other areas of Erie County the week of May 14 to
enforce dog laws. The officials plan to issue citations or warnings for
laws pertaining to dog licenses, rabies vaccinations and dogs that are
out of control or running at large, according to a statement today from
the state Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Dog Law Reading - Pennsylvania’s
Commonwealth Court has turned down Reading’s request to reconsider its
February order throwing out the so-called aggressive breed ordinance.
City officials said Tuesday that they will appeal to the state Supreme
Court. The new appeal, as with the former, has no immediate effect.
The overturned ordinance imposed severe restrictions on owners of dogs
considered aggressive, but no breeds have been put on the aggressive
list since 2003. RHODE ISLAND http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/ H7011
- AN ACT RELATING TO ANIMALS - DOGS - This act would permit the animal
control officer in the town of Warren to issue citations to animal
owners who are in violation of any animal control ordinance which may be
paid by mail and also to prescribe pecuniary penalties.
House read and passed. H7212- AN ACT
RELATING TO ANIMALS AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY - CRUELTY TO ANIMALS - This act
would provide for judicial direction regarding incarceration related to
animal fighting. H7284- AN ACT
RELATING TO ANIMALS ANIMAL HUSBANDRY - DOGS - This act would prohibit
any person from keeping a dog tethered, penned, caged, fenced or other
wise confined outside for more than thirty (30) minutes when temperature
is beyond the weather safety scale as set forth in the most recent
adopted version of the Tufts Animal Care Condition Scale. "Guardian" is
also defined as the owner/possessor of the dog2/27/2008 Committee recommended measure be held for further study
S2006- AN ACT
RELATING TO ANIMALS -DOGS - This act would permit the animal control
officer in the town of Warren to issue citations to animal owners who
are in violation of any animal control ordinance which may be paid by
mail and also to prescribe pecuniary penalties.Senate read and passed 05/15/2008
S2008
-AN
ACT RELATING TO ANIMALS AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY - CRUELTY TO ANIMALS - This
act would increase the various penalties related to animal cruelty.
S2030- AN ACT
RELATING TO ANIMALS AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY - CRUELTY TO ANIMALS - This act
would provide for mandatory imprisonment for convictions related to
animal fighting
S2043
- AN
ACT RELATING TO ANIMALS AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY - REGULATION OF VICIOUS
DOGS - This act would add the director of the defenders of animals or
his or her designee to the hearing panel which decides whether as dog
should be declared vicious.
S2096
- AN
ACT RELATING TO ANIMALS AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY - DOGS - This act would
provide guidelines and penalties for any person that keeps a dog outside
tethered, penned, caged, fenced or otherwise contained without adequate
shelter from the elements.. "Guardian" is also defined as the
owner/possessor of the dog (guardian would be interchangeable with
owner/possessor). SOUTH CAROLINA
www.scstatehouse.net/index/html HB5010- A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 47-3-710, AS AMENDED, CODE
OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF TERMS
USED IN THE REGULATION OF DANGEROUS ANIMALS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT
DANGEROUS ANIMALS INCLUDE CERTAIN BREEDS AND SPECIES, INCLUDING PIT
BULLS, TO AUTHORIZE BUT NOT REQUIRE, COUNTY GOVERNING BODIES TO
DESIGNATE OTHER BREEDS OR SPECIES AS DANGEROUS ANIMALS; AND TO DELETE
THE PROVISION THAT AN ANIMAL IS NOT A DANGEROUS ANIMAL SOLELY BY VIRTUE
OF ITS BREED OR SPECIES S833 - TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING
SECTION 47-1-45 SO AS TO PROHIBIT THE TETHERING, FASTENING, CHAINING,
TYING, OR RESTRAINING A DOG TO A STATIONARY OBJECT FOR MORE THAN THREE
HOURS A DAY OR FOR MORE THAN SIX HOURS A DAY ON A TROLLEY SYSTEM; TO
PROVIDE CLASS I MISDEMEANOR CRIMINAL PENALTIES; AND TO AUTHORIZE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT BY ORDINANCE TO VARY THESE REGULATIONS. 'Confine an animal
in a cruel manner' or cruel confinement of an animal' means confining an
animal by means of a cage, crate, pen, or similar confinement under
circumstances in which the person intends to endanger the animal's
health or safety, or the person reasonably should have known would
endanger the animal's health or safety PASSED House Referred to Committee on Judiciary Anderson - City Council member Tony Stewart is proposing a ban on new
pit bulls and tighter restrictions on existing pit bulls some owners
have in the city. The proposed ordinance says existing pit bulls present
an unacceptable risk of harm and fear to residents. Under the proposed
ordinance existing pit bulls must have a fenced yard, you must be at
least 18 year old to walk the dog, and it must have a muzzle on it's
mouth. Also, owners must have a $1,000.00 dollar insurance policy. Also,
pit bulls must have their tags and shots. UPDATE:City
Council continued its investigation into vicious dogs Monday night
(4/28/08), appointing a seven-member committee to continue to look at
the issue. Jose Fernandez, a doctor at Magnolia Veterinary Hospital,
Duff Leuder of K-9 Pet Dog Training, Herbert Ervin, the city's animal
control officer, Angela Wallace, vice president of the Anderson County
Humane Society, and City Councilman Tony Stewart will serve on the
committee. A second council member and a member to be elected by the
committee also will be appointed to serve. City officials have been
bombarded with information since the issue of banning pit bulls came up
last month. Mayor Terence Roberts said he's received magazine articles
and information packets about breed-specific legislation. Dillon - Dillon City Council will soon try to pass an ordinance
that would require all pit bulls to be registered with the city. The
proposed ordinance, which is three pages long, also would restrict where
the owners could take their dogs. If the ordinance is passed, those who
fail to follow it would face fines. Councilman Randolph Gurley is
spearheading the campaign to restrict pit bulls within the city limits.
"We had an ordinance to ban pit pulls from the city limits, but we got
so much controversy from that,” he said. “We have decided to go back and
re-do the ordinance and take it and restrict them to the premises.”
UPDATE: 5/12/08 - Dillon City Council approved an ordinance that
defines the pit-bull as a dangerous animal, and gives owners stricter
guidelines. The council’s decision was unanimous. Pit-bull owners must
register their dog with Dillon Police. If the dog is walked within the
city limits it must be on a four to five foot leash. A fence is also
required and any owner that violates the new ordinance could face fines,
legal charges up to a misfeasor and the dog could even be put to sleep.
This ordinance also includes dogs that look like bull terriers, or
American Staffordshire Terriers. Florence - Students at one Florence middle school hope to go before
county council to talk about Breed Specific Legislation. That's
legislation that would prohibit residents from owning, breeding, or
raising particular types of dogs, like pit bulls. The seventh grade
class from Southside Middle, however, is proposing to block such
legislation from ever passing in Florence County. Lancaster County - Round two
for a proposed vicious dog ordinance. Last month, a citizens' committee
was tweaking a proposed law that would've automatically labeled certain
dog breeds vicious. The ordinance labeled pit bulls, American bulldogs,
and canary dogs as vicious animals and required that they be registered
with the county, kept inside a steel cage, and wear special
bright-colored collars. The citizens' committee stripped all the
breed-specific language from the newest version of the ordinance. At the
very least, county leaders say a leash law will come out of all these
talks. That's something the county has never had. The last vote on the
ordinance will likely be taken next month. UPDATE:
Lancaster
County Animal Control Director Joel Hinson said there may be some
confusion about the new animal control laws County Council finalized
last week. What do the county's new animal control laws require? Lyman - ordinance limiting how long a dog can be tethered and
prohibiting dangerous dogs from being in the town was approved
by the town council Thursday (3/20). A special meeting was called to have the second and final
reading on the ordinance. The first reading was on March 13. The 11-page
ordinance specifies numerous aspects of animal control and makes Lyman a
rarity in Spartanburg County: a town that bans the existence of
dangerous animals in the community. A dangerous dog was defined as any
dog that: Attacks a person, domestic animal or domesticated dog or cat
and causes physical injury or death when unprovoked. Bites or attempts
to bite any person while at large. Attacks or attempts to attack any
other dog or animal or chases or catches a person while at large. Poses
a threat of harm or endangers the safety of persons, domesticated
animals while at large or not at large. Is owned or harbored for dog
fighting. Is trained for the purpose of dog fighting or has engaged in
dog fighting. Is tormented, badgered, baited, trained or encouraged to
engage in unprovoked attacks upon people or domesticated animals. Richland County - current ordinance offers few restrictions on
vicious dogs, except how they should be confined on property. Lexington
and Kershaw counties have vicious-dog ordinances but no dog limits per
household or breed restrictions. Still, Councilman Norman Jackson,
chairman of council’s development and services committee, said getting County
Council to approve specific measures, like household limits or breed
restrictions, “shouldn’t be a problem.” TENNESSEE http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/ HB2803- AN ACT to amend Animals and Animal Cruelty - Enacts the
“Tennessee Animal Abuser Registration, Tracking and Verification Act of
2008.” - Amends TCA Title 40, Chapter 39. This bill establishes
registration, verification, and tracking requirements for an animal
abuser, which means any person who commits aggravated cruelty to
animals, felony animal fighting, or bestiality. The requirements under
this bill for the animal abuser registry are similar to the present law
requirements for sex offenders. The Tennessee bureau of investigation (TBI)
would maintain the registry.
SB2676 - AN ACT to amend Animals and Animal Cruelty - Enacts the
“Tennessee Animal Abuser Registration, Tracking and Verification Act of
2008.” - Amends TCA Title 40, Chapter 39. This bill establishes
registration, verification, and tracking requirements for an animal
abuser, which means any person who commits aggravated cruelty to
animals, felony animal fighting, or bestiality. The requirements under
this bill for the animal abuser registry are similar to the present law
requirements for sex offenders. The Tennessee bureau of investigation (TBI)
would maintain the registry. Bristol - The City Council has enacted a new tethering ordinance
with intentions of preventing injury and unnecessary suffering of dogs.
Though the ordinance passed unanimously, Mayor David Shumaker said a
total ban on tethering is not realistic. "It’s very difficult to
legislate morality," he said. "And in the end, that’s what we’re trying
to assist in doing. Doing away with tethering completely – I just don’t
now how that would be accepted here." Shumaker asked City Manager Jeff
Broughton if police could deliver the new ordinance in the form of a
flyer to residences in the city where it appears dogs may be suffering
harm from tethering. City Attorney Jack Hyder said he and city staff
looked at ordinances across the country and came up with what they
believe is "a fair compromise." The new laws make it unlawful to tether
a dog unless: Tether weighs not more than one-eighth of dog’s weight;
tether provides 12 feet of movement; tether is equipped with swivel
device; a non-choke collar is used; access to food, water, shelter is
provided, and dog remains on owner’s property unless consent is given by
property owner upon which the tether extends. The punishment for not
following these requirements is a $50 fine. Councilwoman Margaret
Feierabend called the new ordinance "incremental" and said it was only a
matter of time until the city outlaws tethering. Hardeman County - Commission unanimously passed
a resolution Tuesday night (4/22/08) banning the ownership, harboring,
or possession of Pit Bulls, including Bull Terriers, Staffordshire Bull
Terriers, American Bull Terriers and American Staffordshire Terriers.
The resolution also bans the ownership of mixed breeds that have the
same appearance and characteristics of the above-mentioned breeds.
Persons owning such dogs at the present time may retain possession,
provided they comply with all provisions stated within the resolution
within 30 days. The law goes into effect immediately. Selmer - Selmer city council
passed
their proposed
pit bull ban
at the council meeting last night.(5/13/08)NO GRANDFATHER CLAUSE. Citizens have 90 days
to "rehome" their dogs. TEXAShttp://www.capitol.state.tx.us/ Amarillo - An ordinance that would ban tethering of dogs in Amarillo
is on hold. City commissioners were briefed on the ordinance in April
and informally agreed with banning tethering of dogs. City Manager Alan
Taylor said he is not ready to bring the ordinance to a vote because he
wants more time to determine its ultimate impact. "It becomes a question
of humane treatment of the animal (taking) precedence over protection of
the community," Taylor said. "We are going to go back and do some
research and see exactly what type of experience (other cities) had when
they enacted their ordinance." Austin, city of - The Animal Advisory Commission convened on
Wednesday, 4/16/08 to discuss the following: ASPCA mission, budget
priorities, pet trader ordinance, petland/TLAC shelter cat adoption
program, no kill subcommittee recommendations, dangerous dog ordinance
recommendations, new shelter update, and future agenda items. The
Dangerous Dog Ordinance is still being discussed at the Austin Animal
Advisory Commission meetings. It is brought up every monthly meeting
but can not get any kind of consensus to pass anything. The commission
keeps sending it back to the sub committee for a re-write. UPDATE: Austin City Council passed the Pet Trader Ordinance with the
definition of a pet trader as "a person who exchanges for consideration
more than fifteen dogs or cats, or both, in a year." The term excludes
the animal shelter or a person who makes an exchange that is not for
profit. Dallas - Theproposed ordinance
(http://cityhallblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/04/new-pet-ordinances.html)
in part calls for the mandatory spaying or neutering of all pets,
restrictions on tethering pets in a yard and limiting the number of dogs
and cats to six per household. The full council will conduct a June 18
briefing on the proposed ordinance, with a formal vote to follow the
next week, on June 25, Dr. Garcia said Thursday. Given the strong
feelings on both sides of the issue, gear up: Plenty of humans will be
barking up a storm at City Hall. Frisco - Puts map of dangerous dogs online. With a click of a
button, Frisco residents can find out if a dangerous dog lives near
them. Lubbock - Animal Shelter Advisory Committee voted against Mandatory
Pet Spay/Neuter and Intact Dog Permits (04/25/08) Madisonville - In February, 2008, Pit bulls were no longer
welcomed, or legal, in Madisonville. The city council passed an
ordinance effectively banning pit bulls within the city limits. UPDATE:
RPOA has presented a brief by Attorney Zandra Anderson to Madisonville
elected city officials regarding their breed specific legislation passed
in violation of state law and will be pursuing this issue. Plano - working on an ordinance to ban tethering and also develop a
program that would provide low- or fixed-income residents with kennels
and dog runs.
UTAH
http://www.le.state.ut.us/ VERMONT
http://www.leg.state.vt.us/
Vermont's Supreme Court will hear a case about whether a pet owner has
the right to compensation for the emotional pain and loss of
companionship when the animal dies as a result of negligence. Sensing
the importance of the case, veterinary associations—including the AVMA—animal
rights groups, and other interested parties are weighing in. Although
limited to the state of Vermont, the court's decision has the potential
to reshape animal jurisprudence in this country as well as the practice
of veterinary medicine. H0067 - AN ACT RELATING TO HOMEOWNER’S INSURANCE AND DOMESTIC DOGS
- This bill proposes to prohibit the presence of dogs as a factor in the
sale of homeowner’s insurance except when a specific dog is documented
to have caused significant damage to real or personal property or bodily
injury to a person. H0108 - AN ACT RELATING TO THE IMPOUNDMENT OF VICIOUS DOMESTIC PETS OR
WOLF-HYBRIDS - This bill proposes to direct municipalities to impound
immediately a domestic pet or wolf-hybrid that has attacked a person
. H0186- AN ACT RELATING TO MUNICIPAL DAMAGES FOR DOMESTIC ANIMALS INJURED
OR KILLED BY DOGS - This bill proposes to limit the financial liability
of municipalities for damages for domestic animals killed or injured by
dogs to no more than $125.00 per animal. H0287- AN ACT RELATING TO TRANSPORTING UN-TETHERED DOGS IN OPEN
PICKUP TRUCKS - This bill
proposes to prohibit the transportation of un-tethered dogs in the back
of open pickup trucks. H769 - AN ACT RELATING TO REGULATION OF COMMERCIAL DOG BREEDERS IN
VERMONT. This bill proposes to regulate commercial dog breeders in
Vermont. S0022- AN ACT RELATING TO PREVENTION OF INJURIES CAUSED BY DANGEROUS DOGS
- This bill proposes to prevent injuries from dangerous dogs. S0341 -AN ACT RELATING TO THE REGISTRATION OF PET MERCHANTS - This bill
clarifies that a pet dealer is anyone who sells an animal and sets out
compliance criteria for dog breeders.
VIRGINIA
http://www.virginia.gov/cmsportal2/index.html HUNTING DOG ENTHUSIASTS check out
http://vhdoa.uplandbirddog.com/staterk.htmlfor bills affecting your sport!! Also
bookmark
http://vhdoa.uplandbirddog.com/stater.html(sorry
this page has moved)for
more information onhouse & senate bills.
The Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) has targeted
Virginia's hound hunters, asking its millions of misguided supporters to
send emails to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries’ (DGIF)
Hounds Study Stakeholders Advisory Committee (SAC). Its anti-hunting
alert and preprogrammed webpage attack calling for additional hound
hunting restrictions.
In a closely related development, after a five-month delay, the
HSUS-PETA-DGIF December 2007 hounds study "focus group" meeting summary
was just released. DGIF's Virginia Tech (VT) study facilitator invited
HSUS and PETA to a meeting over the objections of sportsmen and some
DGIF board members. The anti-hunting animal rightists' principal
complaints were hound hunting is cruel and un-sportsman-like, hounds are
abused and hounds-men and dogs trespass. For further information and
instructions, Virginia Sportsmen should contact
http://vhdoa.uplandbirddog.com Richmond - Gov. Kaine signed legislation toughening the law
against animal fighting and proposed an earlier effective date for a
measure regulating so-called "puppy mills," concluding his action on the
889 bills passed by the 2008 General Assembly. Lawmakers will reconvene
April 23 to consider Kaine's amendments and previously announced
vetoes. Kaine also signed legislation making cockfighting a felony and
giving authorities more tools for investigating and prosecuting
dogfighters. The measure gained broad support after the federal
dogfighting conspiracy conviction of suspended NFL star Michael Vick.
The governor proposed making the puppy mill legislation effective Jan. 1
instead of July 1, 2009. The legislation requires large commercial dog
breeding operations to get a business license and submit to inspections
by local animal control officers. It also imposes strict record-keeping
requirements. The bill was prompted by problems last year at several
puppy mills, including a fire that killed nearly 200 animals in Bland
County and the discovery of more than 1,000 dogs at a Carroll County
dog-breeding operation.
WASHINGTONhttp://www.leg.wa.gov/legislature Tacoma - Pierce County - In the aftermath of
several dog attacks last year, the Pierce County Council is considering
an ordinance that will make owners pay higher fees to own animals that
are considered to be dangerous.
UPDATE:
If Pierce County Executive John Ladenburg signs the ordinance, which he
is expected to do, all dogs would be treated the same regardless of
their breed. This should be a comforting thought to pit bull and
Rottweiler owners, who often say good and bad dogs are unjustly lumped
together based on breed rather than behavior. The proposed ordinance
would address the idea that there are no bad dogs, just bad owners. That
would mean it wouldn’t matter if your face were mauled by a pit bull or
a Pomeranian. Dog owners would have to fork over a $500 fee each year
they own a dangerous dog, one that has severely injured a person or
another animal. Those owners of dangerous dogs would also have to carry
$500,000 in liability insurance. Union Gap - At the Union Gap City Council meeting Monday
night,(5/12/08) the council added some teeth to its animal laws --
affecting everything from ownership of cats and dogs to chickens and
roosters. The purpose for the revamped ordinance was to clear up some
conflicting and vague language on the books, Mayor Jim Lemon said. Among
the changes: *People are limited to owning a maximum of four poultry and
four rabbits on lots less than one-half acre. Roosters are prohibited
outright. * Pet owners are only required to license their dogs if the
animals have committed a violent offense, such as attacking a person.
This means pit bull owners no longer have to automatically license their
dogs. * If an animal owner has a pet that commits the same violent
offense twice, the violator shall be guilty of a criminal misdemeanor
and could face a maximum of 90 days in jail and/or up to a $1,000 fine.
* Unless they have a kennel permit, city dwellers are limited to owning
a maximum of four dogs or cats -- or a combination of both -- on each
individual, legal lot. Councilman Dave Matson opposed this latter rule,
saying people should be allowed to own four cats and four dogs -- if
that's their wish. "Who can control cats, anyway?" he said. "Who can
monitor cats? They're like rats." Despite Matson's appeal, his request
was defeated by the council 4-3.
WESTVIRGINIAhttp://www.legis.state.wv.us/index.cfm Hampshire County - Romney - proposed new ordinance on barking dogs
is under review by Hampshire County officials and will be the subject of
a public hearing before it is enacted. The ordinance says that when a
dog's barking occurs continually and is audible beyond the property line
where it is located for beyond 30 minutes, and is attested to by at
least two people not in the same household, the dog owner is in
violation of the ordinance. The barking can also be of shorter duration
and occurring on more than five occasions within a five-day period, but
still must be attested to by the two people. The ordinance calls for
investigation of complaints and enforcement to be handled by the animal
control officer and his deputies. The proposal calls for appearance
before a magistrate and appeals of convictions there are made to circuit
court. Morgantown - West Virginia Citizens for Honest Adoption
(CHAP) has asked Morgantown City Council to approve an ordinance for
animal rights and pet owner safety. The group has asked council to take
a closer look at the city's rules on animal cruelty.
WISCONSINhttp://www.legis.state.wi.us The Wisconsin Conservation Congress - Voted on
April 14 to urge the state to develop a gray wolf hunt to keep
population numbers within management objectives. The wolf hunt
resolution passed through the Conservation Congress by a vote of 4,848
to 772 according to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Arpin - Pit bulls and pit bull mixes are no longer welcome in one
Central Wisconsin village. The Wood County village of Arpin has amended
its dog ordinance to ban the breeds after a number of complaints from
residents. Village president John Esser says there was a discussion
about whether it was fair to single out one breed, but it was only a
short talk. Dogs of that breed that were already registered with the
village as of April 1 are exempted from the amendment. But if one were
to attack a person, it would also be banned. In 2003 Neillsville
approved a similar ban, a year after five serious dog bites involving
pit bulls were reported. Wausau also discussed a pit bull ban but it
later made the ban more general to outlaw what it called dangerous
animals. Those are defined as animals that approach or chase humans and
other animals in a menacing fashion, or that bite or inflict injury.
Cudahy - city is looking to pass a Pit Bull/Vicious Dog ordinance Madison - A proposal to establish a hunting season on gray wolves
will be up for a vote Monday night at the statewide spring meetings of
the Conservation Congress, a powerful advisory group to the state
Department of Natural Resources on outdoor sporting issues. Brust, who
chairs the Conservation Congress committee on wolves, said he expects
the proposal to pass. If it does, the DNR will probably look more
seriously at a hunting season on an animal that, less than two years
ago, was still on the federal endangered species list. Brust said that
as wolf population numbers have climbed, depredation by some wolves on
livestock, pets and hunting dogs has increased. A wolf hunting season,
he said, would not only be a way to keep the population in check, it
would also help retain support for the recovery program, especially in
Northern Wisconsin. Farmers and others who have to deal with problem
wolves were encouraged last year, Brust said, when the delisting of the
wolf allowed them to shoot wolves on their land if they are killing
livestock. A hunting season would be another important step. Marshfield - Would you believe the animal control officer,
uses a "poop control device". Residents are allowed 2 dogs/2 cats. If
you have, or want more, the animal control officer will come out and
inspect you. They have a "poop wand" a device they wave over the ground
to determine if you have picked up new poop, or if you let the poop set
there a long time, seeping into the ground. The readings they get on
their "poop control device" determines if they are going to let you have
more than 2 dogs or 2 cats. Menomonee Falls - April 7th the Board voted to NOT adopt a pet
limit and to remove the term "guardian" from the ordinances. Mineral Point - City Council notified dogs were no longer
allowed in the Library Park, the Pocket Park and the Softball Field. A
resident was not picking up his dog's waste, rather than deal with the
individual they decided to punish ALL dog owners because they did not
want to confront him. Claims to be done in the name of "fairness". Mosinee - Pit bulls and any mixed breed dog that contains a portion
of pit bull could be banned by the Mosinee City Council tonight.
(5/12/08) City staff members have revised the city's animal ordinance
to include the prohibition of any pit bull terrier, including American
pit bull terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, American Staffordshire
terrier or pit bull mix. Onalaska - After months of debate on “puppy mills” and dog-lovers’
rights, the Onalaska Town Board passed an ordinance Monday (4/28/08) that limits
residents to either two or four dogs, depending on the zoning of their
home. Under the new ordinance residents living on land zoned for
residential use are permitted to keep no more than two dogs older than 5
months on their property. People living on land zoned exclusive
agriculture, transitional agriculture or agriculture A or B are
permitted up to four dogs older than 5 months. Owners with more
than four dogs must obtain a kennel/commercial animal operation permit
through La Crosse County. Included in the four-page ordinance are
existing stipulations that dogs need to be licensed and collared. Also,
“dangerous or vicious” dogs are not permitted in the town, pet owners
need to clean up their animals’ waste and owners could be held
responsible for damage committed by their pets. Racine - Alderman Ray DeHahn is calling for stricter handling of
vicious dogs. He originally asked the city attorney to draft an
ordinance specifically dealing with pit bulls. But he has since
reconsidered the now-drafted ordinance, which he said would be too
difficult to enforce. The drafted ordinance would have prohibited the
"ownership, harboring, or possessing of pit bulls within the city of
Racine." The draft would have allowed current registered owners to keep
their pit bulls as long as they followed stricter regulations. Instead
of a pit bull ordinance, the city should look into leash and muzzle
regulations, he said. DeHahn is still uncertain about the details, such
as who would enforce regulations, how it would be funded and how much
the fines would be. Two Rivers - City Council members approved four ordinance
amendments Monday (5/5/08) evening related to the number of dogs and
cats people can have in the city. Now, people who want to exceed the
number of dogs and cats allowed can apply for a waiver permit. An
ordinance that went into effect last year set the limit at three adult
dogs, five adult cats or a combination of the two resulting in no more
than five total and no more than three adult dogs. Anyone wanting to
exceed the limit could apply for a kennel license, whether it was to
operate a commercial kennel, provide foster care for rescued animals,
raise dogs to show or for any other reason, including just wanting a lot
of pets. The ordinance amendment approved by the council differentiates
between commercial kennels, which must obtain a kennel license, and
households that have numerous animals for other reasons, which must
obtain a waiver permit. Fees accompanying the waiver permit are $25 per
year for four to six dogs or six to 10 cats, or a combination of dogs
and cats totaling no more than 10, and $50 for more animals than that.
Annual costs for commercial kennels to obtain a kennel license are $50
for up to 10 animals or $75 for more than 10. For both kennel licenses
and waiver permits, inspections are required, waivers and licenses can
be revoked, and people may appeal denials or revocations to the City
Council. Village of Slinger -
Despite the fact that the State of Wisconsin enacted a rabies exemption
law for health compromised pets, the Village of Slinger elected
officials believe that they know more about animal health than the State
of Wisconsin Veterinarian as well as the foremost authorities on animal
vaccines. The Village of Slinger has proven itself to be yet another
“unfriendly pet community” in Southeast Wisconsin. Not only do they have
pet limit laws, but now they will also force people to go into hiding
who want to protect the health of their animals. Expect to see licensing
compliance in this community. There are new residential areas being
built in Slinger. Warn all animal owners to stay away from this
municipality if the current elected officials continue to make
irrational decisions. By not following the advice of experts, they have
proven to be a very unfriendly community.
COUNTRIES -
OF OTHER INTEREST
AFRICA
-
MIRI: The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has found
Sarawak to be “extremely weak” in enforcing laws against cruelty to
animals and endangered wildlife. The laws drawn up by the state
government were good but there was something very wrong with the
enforcement, said UNDP’s expert in environmental conservation in
Sarawak, Dr Alexander Sayok. Uganda - President Yoweri Museveni has instructed the agriculture
ministry to review veterinary and animal legislations to stop nomadic
practices, which he said facilitate the spread of diseases. Hillary Onek,
the agriculture minister, said illegal movement of animals had increased
the spread of diseases, threatening national productivity. "The
President wants strong laws and serious punitive measures to stop
illegal animal movements that are increasing the spread of diseases," he
said. Speaking during a workshop on effective control of animal movement
at Colline Hotel, Mukono, recently, the minister said the review would
add tough jail terms on the present dormant laws. Due to nomadic
tendencies and illegal animal movement, the foot-and-mouth disease
spread like a wildfire when it broke out in 2006 in western Uganda, Onek
asserted.
CANADA
- New Tecumseth - Changes to the bylaw were scheduled for
discussion at a committee of the whole meeting Monday night, but the
issue was deferred to a June meeting because residents who had requested
to be contacted about the bylaw were not given notice. The changes to
the bylaw would require kennels to have at least five-acres. The new
bylaw would also limit homeowners to three dogs in urban areas and five
dogs in rural areas. Special permits would be available for people
exceeding the dog limit. Dog owners would have to apply to the town and
approved owners would face a $500 licensing fee for each dog over the
limit. Toronto - The legislation that was supposed to give Ontario the
toughest animal protection laws in Canada isn't tough enough, doesn't
properly fund enforcement and could end up charging farmers for routine
activities like castrating animals, critics said Thursday. While the
governing Liberals say the proposed legislation is strict by slapping
animal abusers with fines, jail terms and a lifetime ban on owning pets,
a growing chorus of critics say the law doesn't apply to wildlife and
doesn't give the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals enough money to catch abusers. "There are people in our society
who, for whatever reason, have done some pretty cruel things to animals,
and we need legislation to deal with that," said New Democrat Gilles
Bisson. "Does this legislation do that? Partly. But it doesn't go to the
extent that some in the communities who are interested in animals and
cruelty to animals would like us to go." Yukon - The Yukon government wants to expand its animal protection
laws and stiffen penalties for anyone convicted of animal abuse. The
proposed amendments to the Animal Protection Act, announced Monday,
would also boost powers for officers who are investigating complaints.
The changes would permit animal protection officers to obtain warrants
by telephone, allowing those in rural areas to act more quickly.
Currently, animal protection officers who need to get a warrant have to
do so in person. RCMP would also be allowed to enter homes without a
warrant if they suspect an urgent case of animal abuse is taking place.
Penalties would go up, with maximum fines of $10,000 and jail terms of
up to two years. The current maximum penalties for violations of the act
are a $500 fine and a six-month jail term.
RUSSIA Moscow - City Hall is spending $64 million to neuter as many as
50,000 stray dogs because of a rising number of attacks on people. More
than 22,000 Muscovites were bitten last year, a rate of 60 a day.
One-third of these were hospitalized with severe injuries, and more than
90 percent were inoculated for rabies, according to the Federal Consumer
Protection Service.
SCOTLAND
- Glasgow - a proposed change to current law would make owners could
be liable to pay up to ?5,000 in compensation for injury or damage. In
the most serious cases they could face an unlimited fine and up to two
years in jail. The orders could require measures like muzzling,
re-homing, and owners attending mandatory dog-training courses.
SWITZERLAND
- Catch and Release fishing will be banned in Switzerland from next
year, it was revealed this week. And anglers in the country will have to
demonstrate their expertise by taking a course on humane methods of
catching fish, under new legislation outlined by the Bundesrat - the
Swiss Federal Parliament. The new legislation states that fish caught
should be killed immediately following their capture, with a sharp blow
to the head from a blunt instrument. Under the new regulations, the use
of live bait and barbed hooks is also prohibited except in certain
situations. The laws come into effect in 2009 but while the Swiss
government does not mention Catch and Release specifically, it does say
that "it is not permitted to go fishing with the 'intention' to release
the fish." Bern - All dog owners in Switzerland will have to take courses
and pass tests if they want to keep their pets under legislation
approved by the federal cabinet yesterday (04/23/08). An examination on
how to properly look after the dog will be introduced in September,
along with a practical test to demonstrate control over the animal.
Initially, owners will have two years to follow courses but by 2010 it
will be necessary to pass the theory exam in order to keep any kind of
dog, whether it is a Chihuahua or an Irish wolfhound.
UNITEDKINGDOM
- Eastbourne Borough - Council bosses say they want to encourage
people to look after their dogs in public places, clean up after them
and make sure their pets aren't bothering other walkers. The orders,
created under the provisions of the Clean Neighborhoods and Environment
Act 2005, cover four different offences which are: • Failing to keep a
dog on a lead in designated areas. • Failing to remove dog feces. •
Permitting a dog to enter land from where it is banned. • Failing to put
and keep a dog on a lead, when directed to do so.. The control orders
replace the existing dog bye-laws. The additional provisions that have
been made are as follows: • The area covered by the dog fouling law has
been extended to include the Downland estate. • More dogs must now be
kept on leads when walking in the cemetery at Ocklynge and the grounds
of the crematorium and cemetery in Langney. There is also a new order
which allows designated council officers to request that owners place
and keep their dogs on a lead if instructed to do so. This order applies
to all the areas not already covered by the dogs on leads and dog ban
orders, and will only be used if it is felt that a dog is not being kept
under proper control. Effective
April 14, 2008 Kent - Abandon your pet and face a fine of up to ?20,000 or jail
– this is the message to irresponsible dog owners who dump their animals
on the street. As recent RSPCA figures reveal that cases of abandoned animals are on
the up, one Kent council is taking steps to remind the public of the
cost of breaking animal welfare laws. This week, the RSPCA announced a
3.8 per cent increase in the number of animals it rescued because they
were dumped by their owners last year, with a total of 1,602 picked up.
Under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, people who abandoned or abuse animals
can be sent to prison or be fined up to ?20,000. In Canterbury, the
number of stray dogs on the streets is rising so rapidly there are fears
the local sanctuaries may soon reach bursting point. Each year around 60
strays taken to the Lord Whisky Animal Sanctuary , Stelling Minnis, to be re-homed. Sanctuary
owner Margaret Todd said: “The problem has got so bad that all the
sanctuaries are full. And as we have a policy of not putting any animal
to sleep we will start having to turn them away.”
AROUND THE WORLD NOTES
In Britain , hunting with dogs was banned in 2005. Under the
legislation, dogs can still be used to follow a scent but cannot be used
to kill the fox.
Beijing 's many restaurants selling dog meat will close as
part of the city's effort to change its image before the Olympic Games.
Many U.S. states , including Texas, have put
restrictions in place on turtle exports despite a booming Asian market
for turtle meat.
Israel has banned the production of foie gras and California will
end the sale and production of foie gras by 2012.
In Italy
, animals cannot be used on TV in any way that goes against their nature
or subjects them to stress.
Scotland has banned the sale of animals to people under 16 years old
and banned animals as prizes.
Hungary has recently joined
Austria, Singapore, and Croatia in prohibiting wild
animal circus acts.